Lerma v. Shaffer

Filing 6

ORDER VACATING CONSENT ORDER;REASSIGNING CASE. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 1/6/14. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL LERMA, 12 Petitioner, 13 v. 14 JENNIFER SHAFFER, 15 Respondent. 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 13-5546 LHK (PR) ORDER VACATING CONSENT ORDER; REASSIGNING CASE Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner had filed a consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction in 19 this federal habeas corpus matter under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. No. 4.) As such, the court 20 issued an order to reassign this action for all further matters to a magistrate judge. (Doc. No. 5.) 21 However, after further review, it appears that the undersigned was initially assigned this action 22 in error. See General Order 44(D)(5) (“the Clerk shall assign any non-capital habeas petition 23 filed by a prisoner to the same judge who was assigned any previous petitions filed by or on 24 behalf of that prisoner.”). Petitioner has a previously filed non-capital habeas petition with 25 Judge Jon S. Tigar. See Lerma v. Cate, No. 11-4265 JST (N.D. Cal.). 26 Accordingly, the December 30, 2013, order reassigning this case to a magistrate judge is 27 VACATED. This action is REASSIGNED to Judge Jon S. Tigar pursuant to General Order 28 44(D)(5). Order Vacating Consent Order; Reassigning Case G:\PRO-SE\LHK\HC.13\Lerma54error.wpd 1 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 1/6/14 3 _________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Order Vacating Consent Order; Reassigning Case G:\PRO-SE\LHK\HC.13\Lerma54error.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?