Google Inc. v. Rockstar Consortium US LP et al
Filing
19
Administrative Motion to File Under Seal certain portions of Defendant's Motion to dismiss and supporting declaration filed by MobileStar Technologies LLC, Rockstar Consortium US LP. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration OF JOSHUA BUDWIN, # 2 Proposed Order, # 3 REDACTED Motion to Dimiss, # 4 UNREDACTED Motion to Dismiss, # 5 REDACTED Declaration of Afzal Dean, # 6 UNREDACTED Declaration of Afzal Dean)(Reichman, Courtland) (Filed on 1/23/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Courtland L. Reichman (SBN 268873)
creichman@mckoolsmithhennigan.com
MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN P.C.
255 Shoreline Drive, Suite 510
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: (650) 394-1400
Fax: (650) 394-1422
Mike McKool (pro hac vice application to be filed)
mmckool@McKoolSmith.com
Douglas A. Cawley (pro hac vice application to be filed)
dcawley@McKoolSmith.com
Ted Stevenson III (pro hac vice application to be filed)
tstevenson@mckoolsmith.com
David Sochia (pro hac vice application filed)
dsochia@McKoolSmith.com
300 Crescent Court Suite 1500
Dallas, TX 75201
(214) 978-4000
(214) 978-4044 (facsimile)
11
255 Shoreline Drive, Suite 510
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
McKool Smith Hennigan, P.C.
12
Attorneys for Defendants Rockstar
Consortium US LP and MobileStar
Technologies LLC
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION
14
15
16
17
GOOGLE INC.,
Plaintiffs,
18
19
20
vs.
ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP, and
MOBILESTAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
21
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 13-CV-05933 (CW)
DECLARATION OF JOSHUA BUDWIN
IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT
ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP, AND
MOBILESTAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC’S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 13-CV-05933 (CW)
Declaration of Joshua Budwin
1
2
I, Joshua Budwin, declare:
1.
I am an attorney with the law firm of McKool Smith P.C., counsel of record for
3
Defendants Rockstar Consortium US LP and Mobilestar Technologies LLC. (collectively
4
“Rockstar”) in the above-entitled action. I am duly licensed to practice law in the State of Texas. I
5
make this declaration based on my personal knowledge, the record in this action, and matters of
6
public record, and if called upon as a witness, I could and would testify competently as to the
7
matters set forth below.
8
2.
Rockstar is bound by non-disclosure agreements with various non-parties to keep
Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(3) for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Improper Venue and to
11
255 Shoreline Drive, Suite 510
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
confidential the information contained in certain portions of Rockstar’s Motion to Dismiss under
10
McKool Smith Hennigan, P.C.
9
Decline Exercising Jurisdiction under the Declaration Judgment Act (hereinafter “Motion to
12
Dismiss”).
13
3.
Rockstar is also bound by non-disclosure agreements with various non-parties to
14
keep confidential the information contained in certain portions of the Declaration of Afzal Dean in
15
Support of Rockstar’s Motion to Dismiss.
16
4.
Details of Rockstar’s licensing negotiations with non-parties, including the identities
17
of entities currently negotiating with Rockstar, is sensitive, confidential and proprietary business
18
information of Rockstar and these non-party entities. Such information is relevant to Rockstar’s
19
licensing and business strategies. Rockstar and these non-party entities will be harmed by public
20
disclosure of this information.
21
22
23
5.
I have served this declaration on the Declaratory Judgment Plaintiff on January 23,
2014 pursuant to Local Rule 79-5(e).
6.
An unredacted copy of Rockstar’s Motion to Dismiss and Declaration of Afzal Dean
24
in Support of Rockstar’s Motion to Dismiss is attached hereto with all supporting materials,
25
including the confidential portions described above.
26
27
28
-2Case No. 13-CV-05933 (CW)
Declaration of Joshua Budwin
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?