Google Inc. v. Rockstar Consortium US LP et al

Filing 69

STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3.d filed byMobileStar Technologies LLC, Rockstar Consortium US LP. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Related document(s) 67 ) (Budwin, Joshua) (Filed on 5/15/2014)

1
2
3
4
5

Courtland L. Reichman (SBN 268873)
[e-mail]
MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN, P.C.
255 Shoreline Drive, Suite 510
Redwood Shores, California 94065
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
ADDITIONAL COUNSEL LISTED
ON SIGNATURE PAGE

6
7

Attorneys for Defendants
Rockstar Consortium U.S. LP and
MobileStar Technologies LLC

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

OAKLAND

12

Google, Inc.,

13
14
15
16

Case No. 4:13-cv-5933-CW

Plaintiff,

DEFENDANTS ROCKSTAR
CONSORTIUM US LP AND
MOBILESTAR TECHNOLOGIES
LLC’S STATEMENT OF RECENT
DECISION [N.D. CAL. L.R. 7-3(D)(2)]

v.
Rockstar Consortium US LP and MobileStar
Technologies LLC,
Defendants.

17

Hon. Claudia Wilken

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

-1Case No. 4:13-cv-5933-CW

28

McKool 991483v1

DEFENDANTS ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP
AND MOBILESTAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC’S
STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION
[N.D. CAL. L.R. 7-3(D)(2)]

1
2

TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
Pursuant to Local Rule 7-3(d)(2), Defendants Rockstar Consortium U.S. LP and MobileStar

3

Technologies LLC respectfully submit this Statement of Recent Decision calling the Court’s

4

attention to the Eastern District of Texas’ Order denying Samsung’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’

5

First Amended Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 12(b)(1) in

6

Rockstar Consortium US LP v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Case No. 2:13-CV-00900-JRG (E.D.

7

Tex.) Doc. No. 106. The Order is attached as Exhibit A. The Order is relevant to several issues

8

raised in Rockstar’s Motion to Transfer to the Eastern District of Texas Pursuant to § 1404, or, in the

9

Alternative, to Stay (Dkt. 67), which has been set for oral argument on June 26, 2014 (Dkt. 68).

10

If it would assist the Court, Defendants would be pleased to file a short, supplemental brief

11

explaining the Order’s effect on Defendants’ to Motion to Transfer to the Eastern District of Texas

12

Pursuant to § 1404, or, in the Alternative, to Stay.

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

-2Case No. 4:13-cv-5933-CW

28

McKool 991483v1

DEFENDANTS ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP
AND MOBILESTAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC’S
STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION
[N.D. CAL. L.R. 7-3(D)(2)]

1

DATED: May 15, 2014

Respectfully submitted,

2
3

By
/s/ Josh Budwin
Courtland L. Reichman
MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN, P.C.
255 Shoreline Drive Suite 510
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
[phone]
[phone] (facsimile)
Mike McKool (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
Douglas A. Cawley (Admitted Pro Hac
Vice)
[e-mail]
Ted Stevenson III (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
David Sochia (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
McKool Smith, P.C.
300 Crescent Court, Suite 1500
Dallas, TX 75201
[phone]
[phone] (facsimile)

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

Joshua W. Budwin (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
McKool Smith, P.C.
300 W. 6th Street, Suite 1700
Austin, TX 78701
[phone]
[phone] (facsimile)

16
17
18
19
20

Attorneys for Defendants
Rockstar Consortium U.S. LP and MobileStar
Technologies LLC

21
22
23
24
25
26
27

-3Case No. 4:13-cv-5933-CW

28

McKool 991483v1

DEFENDANTS ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP
AND MOBILESTAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC’S
STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION
[N.D. CAL. L.R. 7-3(D)(2)]