Google Inc. v. Rockstar Consortium US LP et al

Filing 90

STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3.d filed byMobileStar Technologies LLC, Rockstar Consortium US LP. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Related document(s) 67 ) (Budwin, Joshua) (Filed on 7/1/2014)

1
2
3
4
5

Courtland L. Reichman (SBN 268873)
[e-mail]
MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN, P.C.
255 Shoreline Drive, Suite 510
Redwood Shores, California 94065
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
ADDITIONAL COUNSEL LISTED
ON SIGNATURE PAGE

6
7

Attorneys for Defendants
Rockstar Consortium U.S. LP and
MobileStar Technologies LLC

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

OAKLAND

12

Google, Inc.,

13
14
15
16

Case No. 4:13-cv-5933-CW

Plaintiff,

DEFENDANTS ROCKSTAR
CONSORTIUM US LP AND
MOBILESTAR TECHNOLOGIES
LLC’S STATEMENT OF RECENT
DECISION [N.D. CAL. L.R. 7-3(D)(2)]

v.
Rockstar Consortium US LP and MobileStar
Technologies LLC,
Defendants.

17

Hon. Claudia Wilken

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

-1Case No. 4:13-cv-5933-CW

28

McKool 991483v1

DEFENDANTS ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP
AND MOBILESTAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC’S
STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION
[N.D. CAL. L.R. 7-3(D)(2)]

1
2

TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
Pursuant to Local Rule 7-3(d)(2), Defendants Rockstar Consortium U.S. LP and MobileStar

3

Technologies LLC respectfully submit this Statement of Recent Decision calling the Court’s

4

attention to the Eastern District of Texas’ Order denying Defendants Google, Inc.’s and Samsung

5

Electronics Co., Ltd.’s motion to stay or in the alternative, to transfer to the Northern district of

6

California in Rockstar Consortium US LP v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Case No. 2:13-CV-

7

00900-JRG (E.D. Tex.) Doc. No. 122. The Order is attached as Exhibit A. The Order is relevant to

8

several issues raised in Rockstar’s Motion to Transfer to the Eastern District of Texas Pursuant to §

9

1404, or, in the Alternative, to Stay (Dkt. 67). As set forth in that order, “the Court does not expect

10

the current California litigation to dispose of key issues in this case and the related Rockstar cases.”

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

-2Case No. 4:13-cv-5933-CW

28

McKool 991483v1

DEFENDANTS ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP
AND MOBILESTAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC’S
STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION
[N.D. CAL. L.R. 7-3(D)(2)]

1

DATED: July 1, 2014

Respectfully submitted,

2
3

By
/s/ Josh Budwin
Courtland L. Reichman
MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN, P.C.
255 Shoreline Drive Suite 510
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
[phone]
[phone] (facsimile)
Mike McKool (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
Douglas A. Cawley (Admitted Pro Hac
Vice)
[e-mail]
Ted Stevenson III (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
David Sochia (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
McKool Smith, P.C.
300 Crescent Court, Suite 1500
Dallas, TX 75201
[phone]
[phone] (facsimile)

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

Joshua W. Budwin (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
McKool Smith, P.C.
300 W. 6th Street, Suite 1700
Austin, TX 78701
[phone]
[phone] (facsimile)

16
17
18
19
20

Attorneys for Defendants
Rockstar Consortium U.S. LP and MobileStar
Technologies LLC

21
22
23
24
25
26
27

-3Case No. 4:13-cv-5933-CW

28

McKool 991483v1

DEFENDANTS ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP
AND MOBILESTAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC’S
STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION
[N.D. CAL. L.R. 7-3(D)(2)]