Campbell et al v. Facebook Inc.

Filing 144

RESPONSE (re 143 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages for Facebook's Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification ) Plaintiffs' Opposition to Facebook's Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages filed byMatthew Campbell, Michael Hurley. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Sobol, Michael) (Filed on 1/6/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 MATTHEW CAMPBELL and MICHAEL HURLEY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, 14 15 16 17 Case No. C 13-05996 PJH (MEJ) [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING FACEBOOK, INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO ENLARGE THE PAGE LIMIT FOR ITS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION Plaintiff, v. FACEBOOK, INC., Defendant. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 13-CV-05996-PJH (MEJ) 1 Having reviewed Defendant Facebook, Inc.’s Administrative Motion to Enlarge Page 2 Limit for Its Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification (Dkt No. 143), as well as 3 Plaintiffs’ opposition thereto; 4 5 6 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Facebook’s motion is denied on the grounds that Facebook has failed to establish good cause for relief from the Local Rules governing page limits. It is so ORDERED. 7 8 9 Dated: January __, 2016 Phyllis J. Hamilton United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 13-CV-05996-PJH (MEJ)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?