Campbell et al v. Facebook Inc.
Filing
159
EXHIBITS re 149 Opposition/Response to Motion,,,,, filed byFacebook Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Chorba Decl. - Exhibit L (filed under seal), # 2 Chorba Decl. - Exhibit M (filed under seal), # 3 Chorba Decl. - Exhibit N (filed under seal), # 4 Chorba Decl. - Exhibit O (filed under seal), # 5 Chorba Decl. - Exhibit P (filed under seal), # 6 Chorba Decl. - Exhibit Q (filed under seal), # 7 Chorba Decl. - Exhibit R (Redacted), # 8 Chorba Decl. - Exhibit S (filed under seal), # 9 Chorba Decl. - Exhibit T (filed under seal), # 10 Chorba Decl. - Exhibit U (filed under seal), # 11 Chorba Decl. - Exhibit V (filed under seal), # 12 Chorba Decl. - Exhibit W (Redacted), # 13 Chorba Decl. - Exhibit X)(Related document(s) 149 ) (Chorba, Christopher) (Filed on 1/16/2016)
EXHIBIT X84
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
JOSHUA A. JESSEN, SBN 222831
JJessen@gibsondunn.com
JEANA BISNAR MAUTE, SBN 290573
JBisnarMaute@gibsondunn.com
ASHLEY M. ROGERS, SBN 286252
ARogers@gibsondunn.com
1881 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: (650) 849-5300
Facsimile: (650) 849-5333
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
GAIL E. LEES, SBN 90363
GLees@gibsondunn.com
CHRISTOPHER CHORBA, SBN 216692
CChorba@gibsondunn.com
333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90071
Telephone: (213) 229-7000
Facsimile: (213) 229-7520
Attorneys for Defendant
FACEBOOK, INC.
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
OAKLAND DIVISION
18
19
MATTHEW CAMPBELL, MICHAEL
HURLEY, and DAVID SHADPOUR,
Plaintiffs,
20
21
22
23
v.
FACEBOOK, INC.,
Case No. C 13-05996 PJH (MEJ)
PUTATIVE CLASS ACTION
DEFENDANT FACEBOOK, INC.’S
RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO
PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST SET OF REQUESTS
FOR ADMISSION
Defendant.
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
DEFENDANT FACEBOOK, INC.’S RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO
PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
Case No. C 13-05996 PJH (MEJ)
1
Defendant Facebook, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Facebook”), by and through its attorneys, and
2
pursuant to Rules 26 and 36 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Civil Rules of the U.S.
3
District Court for the Northern District of California, the Court orders in this action, and the parties’
4
agreements and conferences among counsel, provides the following responses and objections to
5
Plaintiffs’ First Set of Requests for Admission (each, a “Request,” collectively the “Requests”).
6
OBJECTIONS TO DEFINITIONS
7
1.
Facebook objects to Plaintiffs’ definition and use of the terms “You” or “Your” as
8
vague, ambiguous, overly broad, and unduly burdensome to the extent the terms are meant to include
9
“directors, officers, employees, partners, members, representatives, agents (including attorneys,
10
accountants, consultants, investment advisors or bankers), and any other person purporting to act on
11
[Facebook, Inc.’s] behalf. . . . parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, predecessor entities, successor entities,
12
divisions, departments, groups, acquired entities and/or related entities or any other entity acting or
13
purporting to act on its behalf” over which Facebook exercises no control, and to the extent that
14
Plaintiffs purport to use these terms to impose obligations that go beyond the requirements of the
15
Federal and Local Rules.
16
OBJECTION TO PURPORTED “RELEVANT TIME PERIOD”
17
Facebook objects to Plaintiffs’ proposed “Relevant Time Period” (September 26, 2006
18
through the present) because it substantially exceeds the proposed class period identified in Plaintiffs’
19
Consolidated Amended Complaint, does not reflect the time period that is relevant to Plaintiffs’
20
claims in this action, and renders the Requests overly broad, unduly burdensome, and irrelevant.
21
Unless otherwise specified, and pursuant to the agreement of the parties, Facebook’s Responses to
22
these Requests will be limited to information generated between April 1, 2010 and December 30,
23
2013.
24
25
26
27
SPECIFIC RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS
REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 1:
Admit that You have never had “a dedicated team of privacy professionals,” as that term
appears in Your 2012 Form 10-K and Your 2013 Form 10-K.
28
1
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
DEFENDANT FACEBOOK, INC.’S RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO
PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
Case No. C 13-05996 PJH (MEJ)
1
2
RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 1:
Facebook restates and incorporates its Objections to Definitions and its Objection to the
3
Purported “Relevant Time Period” as though fully set forth in this Response. Subject to and without
4
waiving the foregoing objections, Facebook denies this Request.
5
6
7
DATED: June 29, 2015
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
By:
/s/
Joshua A. Jessen
8
9
Attorney for Defendant FACEBOOK, INC.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
DEFENDANT FACEBOOK, INC.’S RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO
PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
Case No. C 13-05996 PJH (MEJ)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
PROOF OF SERVICE
I, Ashley M. Rogers, declare as follows:
I am employed in the County of Santa Clara, State of California, I am over the age of eighteen
years and am not a party to this action; my business address is 1881 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, CA
94304-1211, in said County and State. On June 29, 2015, I served the following document(s):
DEFENDANT FACEBOOK, INC.’S RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO
PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
on the parties stated below, by the following means of service:
David F. Slade
dslade@cbplaw.com
James Allen Carney
acarney@cbplaw.com
Joseph Henry Bates, III
Carney Bates & Pulliam, PLLC
hbates@cbplaw.com
Jeremy A. Lieberman
Pomerantz Grossman Hufford Dahlstrom & Gross LLP
jalieberman@pomlaw.com
Melissa Ann Gardner
mgardner@lchb.com
Nicholas Diamand
ndiamand@lchb.com
Rachel Geman
rgeman@lchb.com
Michael W. Sobol
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP
msobol@lchb.com
Jon A Tostrud
Tostrud Law Group, P.C.
jtostrud@tostrudlaw.com
Lionel Z. Glancy
Glancy Binkow & Goldberg LLP
info@glancylaw.com
25
26
27
28
3
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
DEFENDANT FACEBOOK, INC.’S RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO
PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
Case No. C 13-05996 PJH (MEJ)
1
BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE: On the above-mentioned date, based on a court order or
an agreement of the parties to accept service by electronic transmission, I caused the
documents to be sent to the persons at the electronic notification addresses as shown
above.
4
I am employed in the office of Joshua A. Jessen and am a member of the bar of this court.
5
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
2
3
6
7
Executed on June 29, 2015.
8
/s/
Ashley M. Rogers
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
DEFENDANT FACEBOOK, INC.’S RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO
PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
Case No. C 13-05996 PJH (MEJ)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?