Campbell et al v. Facebook Inc.

Filing 161

EXHIBITS re 149 Opposition/Response to Motion,,,,, filed byFacebook Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Himel Decl. - Exhibit MM (Redacted), # 2 Himel Decl. - Exhibit NN (Redacted), # 3 Himel Decl. - Exhibit OO (Redacted), # 4 Fechete Decl. - Exhibit PP (filed under seal), # 5 Fechete Decl. - Exhibit QQ (filed under seal), # 6 Fechete Decl. - Exhibit RR (filed under seal), # 7 Fechete Decl. - Exhibit SS (filed under seal), # 8 Fechete Decl. - Exhibit TT (filed under seal), # 9 Fechete Decl. - Exhibit UU (filed under seal), # 10 Fechete Decl. - Exhibit VV (filed under seal), # 11 Fechete Decl. - Exhibit WW (filed under seal), # 12 Fechete Decl. - Exhibit XX (filed under seal), # 13 Fechete Decl. - Exhibit YY (filed under seal), # 14 Fechete Decl. - Exhibit ZZ (filed under seal), # 15 Fechete Decl. - Exhibit AAA (filed under seal), # 16 Declaration Declaration of Michael Adkins In Support of Defendant Facebook, Inc.s Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification (Redacted))(Related document(s) 149 ) (Chorba, Christopher) (Filed on 1/16/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP JOSHUA A. JESSEN, SBN 222831 JJessen@gibsondunn.com JEANA BISNAR MAUTE, SBN 290573 JBisnarMaute@gibsondunn.com ASHLEY M. ROGERS, SBN 286252 ARogers@gibsondunn.com 1881 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 849-5300 Facsimile: (650) 849-5333 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP GAIL E. LEES, SBN 90363 GLees@gibsondunn.com CHRISTOPHER CHORBA, SBN 216692 CChorba@gibsondunn.com 333 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: (213) 229-7000 Facsimile: (213) 229-7520 Attorneys for Defendant FACEBOOK, INC. 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 OAKLAND DIVISON 17 MATTHEW CAMPBELL, MICHAEL HURLEY, and DAVID SHADPOUR, 18 Case No. C 13-05996 PJH (MEJ) PUTATIVE CLASS ACTION Plaintiffs, 19 DECLARATION OF ALEX HIMEL ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT FACEBOOK, INC. v. 20 FACEBOOK, INC., 21 Defendant. 22 23 24 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP DECLARATION OF ALEX HIMEL ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT FACEBOOK, INC. Case No. C 13-05996 PJH (MEJ) 1 2 I, Alex Himel, declare as follows: 1. I have been employed as a software engineer at Facebook since April 2009, and my 3 current title is Engineering Director. From 2009-2014, I worked on Facebook’s Developer Platform, 4 and my work encompassed Facebook’s “Share” button, Facebook’s “Like” button, and the code that 5 keeps track of the “count” features associated with “Share” and “Like.” I have personal knowledge 6 of the matters stated herein and, if called as a witness, could and would testify competently thereto. I 7 provide this Declaration to explain certain facts regarding Facebook’s software code as it relates to 8 detecting uniform resource locators (“URLs”) in messages sent and received through the Facebook 9 platform and the relationship of any such URLs to certain social plugins served by Facebook and 10 visible on third-party websites. In particular, I refer below to the count associated with a Facebook 11 “Like” social plugin on third-party websites (the “Like” count). I also explain the termination of 12 related practices in October and December 2012. 13 2. I understand the purported class in this action to consist of Facebook users located 14 within the United States who have sent or received messages that included URLs in the body of the 15 message from December 30, 2011 until in or around late 2012, when the practice of including URL 16 shares in messages in the count on third-party websites ceased (“the Relevant Period”). 17 Facebook’s Source Code 18 19 3. internal Facebook system . These documents, 20 21 Attached as Exhibits A through G are true and correct copies of documents from an , a description include the date o , and the is on the left, and the relevant 22 . The relevant is on the right. 23 . 24 25 26 4. To the extent that the above-mentioned documents contain source code, this code has been redacted for several reasons. 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 1 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY DECLARATION OF ALEX HIMEL ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT FACEBOOK, INC. Case No. C 13-05996 PJH (MEJ) 1 5. First, Facebook’s source code is a closely guarded trade secret of enormous economic 2 value. Providing it to outside parties increases the risk of further disclosure and therefore poses a risk 3 of substantial competitive harm. Disclosure of source code outside of Facebook erodes Facebook’s 4 efforts to protect the code in which Facebook has invested significant resources and which comprises 5 a significant part of Facebook’s product offering and competitive advantage. Indeed, the code 6 reflected in 7 that generates Facebook’s proprietary design and functionalities could cause catastrophic competitive 8 harm by allowing others to replicate that design and functionality without making the same 9 investment of time, money, and personnel. 10 6. is the product of thousands of engineering hours. Revealing the code Second, disclosing portions of Facebook’s source code would reveal the methods used 11 to protect Facebook’s users and the integrity of the Facebook platform, and could undermine both of 12 these efforts. Facebook’s source code includes complex safety and security features that detect spam, 13 detect and prevent abuse of the system, and protect users from malware, among other things. These 14 features not only provide for a better and more enjoyable product (another competitive advantage for 15 Facebook), but also protect Facebook and its users from harm and loss associated with unsolicited 16 and dangerous content and activities by third parties. The effectiveness of these systems depends in 17 part on their secrecy. Disclosure of Facebook’s security methods would potentially allow hackers 18 and abusers to threaten users and the system. 19 7. In the context of certain types of litigation (such as patent litigation) where there may 20 be a legitimate need for source code inspection, I am aware that Facebook negotiates specific 21 protections for source code and implements detailed and time-consuming protocols for handling 22 source code, as well as extensive limitations on the use of source code materials, disclosure, and 23 future restrictions on the conduct of individuals exposed to source code materials. 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 8. In the present case, evidence other than source code is available to demonstrate the processes and functionality at issue. In particular, the non-code information embodied in —effectively demonstrates the processes and functionality at issue. Additionally, the source code for the processes and functionality at issue is not 2 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY DECLARATION OF ALEX HIMEL ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT FACEBOOK, INC. Case No. C 13-05996 PJH (MEJ) 1 limited or contained in any discrete way; that is, it is interconnected with other source code at 2 Facebook. Therefore, if Facebook were required to make source code available in this matter, it 3 would have little choice but to grant access to a significant amount of source code that has nothing to 4 do with the allegations in this case. 5 Share and Like Functionality 6 9. During the Relevant Period, Facebook offered websites “social plugins,” or units of 7 embeddable code that allow users to share information using Facebook directly from third-party 8 websites. A third-party website may have embedded code for the Facebook “Like” button plugin on 9 its website, enabling Facebook users to directly “Like” the website and to share that action with their 10 Facebook connections (without having to return to https://www.facebook.com or the Facebook 11 mobile app to share the content). The “Like” button plugin also may have displayed an anonymous 12 and aggregate count of all “Likes” for that particular website (the above-referenced “Like” count). 13 Facebook also offered a “Share” button, which also may have displayed an anonymous and aggregate 14 count of all “Shares” for that particular website (the “Share” count). 15 10. In September 2009, Facebook enabled functionality that would ultimately allow third- 16 party website developers to provide a count associated with a “Share” button on their websites. 17 Attached as Exhibit A is a 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 3 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY DECLARATION OF ALEX HIMEL ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT FACEBOOK, INC. Case No. C 13-05996 PJH (MEJ) 1 Ex. A at 5, 7-8. In addition to 2 the overall “Share count,” third-party website developers also could view the public API statistics 3 indicating how many times a particular URL was shared. The public API statistics did not include 4 statistics indicating (specifically or by inference) how many times a given URL was shared using the 5 “Share” button and choosing “in a private message.” 6 11. In October 2009, Facebook 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Ex. B at 3-5. 12. At our F8 Developer Conference on April 21, 2010, Facebook announced the public 15 launch of the “Like” button, which also included a count feature reflecting the number of times a user 16 had clicked or commented on the “Like” button on that third-party website. The 17 18 19 20 21 . 13. In May 2010, Facebook Exhibit C is a 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 4 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY DECLARATION OF ALEX HIMEL ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT FACEBOOK, INC. Case No. C 13-05996 PJH (MEJ) . Attached as 1 2 3 4 5 6 Ex. C at 5. URL Preview 14. During the Relevant Period, Facebook’s service included a Messages product, which 7 allowed users to exchange messages that could be viewed in the recipient user’s Messages folder. 8 Beginning in August 2010, Facebook’s source code included functionality supporting a feature 9 10 11 12 13 15. 14 15 —including a brief description of the URL and, if available, a relevant image from the website, as illustrated by the example below: 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 16. 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 5 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY DECLARATION OF ALEX HIMEL ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT FACEBOOK, INC. Case No. C 13-05996 PJH (MEJ) EXHIBIT A

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?