Campbell et al v. Facebook Inc.
Filing
182
EXHIBITS re 181 Administrative Motion to Seal Documents Accompanying Class Certification Briefs and Evidentiary Objections filed by Facebook Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 11 (Unredacted), # 2 Exhibit 12 (Redacted), # 3 Exhibit 13 (Unredacted), # 4 Exhibit 14 (Redacted), # 5 Exhibit 15 (Unredacted), # 6 Exhibit 16 (Redacted), # 7 Exhibit 17 (Unredacted), # 8 Exhibit 18 (Redacted), # 9 Exhibit 19 (Unredacted), # 10 Exhibit 20 (Redacted), # 11 Exhibit 21 (Unredacted), # 12 Exhibit 22 (Redacted), # 13 Exhibit 23 (Unredacted), # 14 Exhibit 24 (Redacted), # 15 Exhibit 25 (Unredacted), # 16 Exhibit 26 (Redacted), # 17 Exhibit 27 (Unredacted), # 18 Exhibit 28 (Redacted))(Related document(s) 181 ) (Chorba, Christopher) (Filed on 3/28/2016) Modified on 3/29/2016 (kcS, COURT STAFF).
CONFIDENTIAL
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
MATTHEW CAMPBELL, MICHAEL
5
HURLEY and DAVID SHADPOUR,
6
Plaintiffs,
7
VS.
8
FACEBOOK, INC.,
9
Case Number
C 13-05996 PJH
Defendant.
10
11
CONFIDENTIAL
12
13
DEPOSITION OF
14
TAKEN ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT
15
ON AUGUST 11, 2015, BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.M.
16
IN LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS
17
18
Reported by:
19
Cheryl D. Glenn, CSR, RPR
20
21
22
23
24
25
PAGES 1 - 259
Page 1
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
A. Well, there's -- there's the networking in
2
that, in career seeking and building expertise if you
3
write or do any kind of scholarly activities, you can
4
share it and get it out to the masses.
5
-- as a practical matter in litigation, client
6
information.
7
relevant in actual discovery and finding out
8
information about other people involved in -- in
9
litigation, whether it's clients or judges or what
10
11
And also as a
I mean, it's -- it's increasingly
have you.
Q. So, is it fair to say that Facebook can be
12
beneficial to lawyers by increasing a lawyer's
13
exposure to the general public?
14
A. Yes, that would be a great way to state it.
15
Q. Do you have an opinion about Facebook?
16
MR. SLADE:
17
THE WITNESS:
18
19
20
Objection.
Object to form.
I use it, I see benefits in
using it both personal and professional.
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
What are the personal
benefits you see?
21
A. Keeping up with family that you don't have
22
time to speak to on the phone, letting people come
23
see all the pictures of your food and babies and
24
whatnot if they want to.
25
don't have to.
And if they don't, they
So, it's -- it's a way to keep in
Page 59
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
touch with a variety of circles in your -- in your
2
life.
3
Q. And how about the professional benefits?
4
A. In a lot of the same ways, it allows you to
5
bring multiple networks of people in your life,
6
professionally speaking, together and to share
7
information and kind of promote your own scholarship
8
activities, opinions, commentaries to people that
9
would find them relevant or helpful.
10
11
Q. Do you think Facebook is a helpful
advertising tool?
12
A. Yes, absolutely.
13
Q. Do you consider Facebook's advertising a part
14
of its service?
15
A. Yes.
16
Q. Can you briefly give me an overview of your
17
18
previous jobs?
A. Professionally post-degrees, I've been at the
19
Bowen School of Law in some capacity since 2005 and
20
as -- as an employee.
21
of a smattering of jobs, but this job in particular
22
I've kind of went from a part-time student and staff
23
member on up to professional level and -- and my --
24
my current role as a faculty member.
25
So, up until then it was kind
Q. And before you worked at the Bowen School of
Page 60
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
A. Blogs are content that you want to push out
2
to, you know, numbers of people, and Facebook has
3
just made the -- the platform a way that anybody can
4
do it and they can share a variety of content.
5
6
7
Q. What's your understanding of what service
Facebook provides to its users?
A. Things I've alluded to here, you know, at
8
different times, professional networking, marketing,
9
building business brand and getting content out but
10
also personal use and keeping together diverse groups
11
of people in your life, family, friends, personal
12
networking, personal sharing of ideas, thoughts,
13
personal experiences.
14
15
Q. What's your understanding of Facebook's
business?
16
MR. SLADE:
17
Object to form.
THE WITNESS:
I mean, I know the CEO.
I've
18
watched The Social Network, so I guess I'm -- as far
19
as that is true, a true depiction, I know a little
20
bit of how that started.
21
it's the biggest among the social media outfits.
22
Beyond that, nothing.
23
24
25
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
I know it's huge.
I know
What's your understanding of
how Facebook makes money?
A. Advertising generally.
And that's gain -Page 120
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
correct?
2
A. Yeah.
3
Q. You haven't read any other articles about the
4
5
Yes.
technical aspects of Facebook social plug-ins?
A. Again, nothing that I recall specifically
6
about that, but perhaps a little bit incidental to a
7
larger story about Facebook use or -- or general
8
privacy concerns on the internet for the, you know,
9
society at large.
10
11
Q. But you're well read in general about
Facebook?
12
MR. SLADE:
13
Object to form.
THE WITNESS:
I wouldn't say it that way.
14
I would say I'm versed in social media use and -- and
15
function but, no, I wouldn't say I'm knowledgeable
16
about Facebook specifically because I know there are
17
people with way more knowledge than me.
18
19
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
Do you understand how the
Facebook like social plug-in works?
20
MR. SLADE:
21
Object to form.
THE WITNESS:
Only in that I know how to
22
add it to a blog, I know the benefits of using it,
23
but that's the extent.
24
25
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
And, again, the benefits are
related to increased exposure?
Page 130
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
A. Yes.
2
Q. And you haven't viewed any Facebook guidance
3
regarding Facebook like social plug-ins?
4
A. Huh-uh.
5
Q. What's your understanding of how the Facebook
6
messages feature works?
7
MR. SLADE:
8
THE WITNESS:
9
Object to form.
They -- they're akin to
e-mail in that they're a direct one-to-one
10
communicate -- well, I guess they can be a group
11
feature.
12
one-to-one direct messages akin to e-mail.
13
14
I don't use that one.
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
But typically a
How did you come to that
understanding?
15
A. Just through my own use over time.
16
Q. Do you recall reviewing any documents about
17
18
19
20
21
22
Facebook message functionality?
A. I never read any in any detail.
I may have
had to agree to something, but I don't recall that.
Q. And you may have read news articles that talk
about Facebook messages at some point?
A. Only incidental to larger stories or -- or
23
maybe the -- when the new version of messenger came
24
out, maybe there was a blurb on that and I -- I read
25
it, but nothing -- nothing specific, in detail.
Page 131
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
2
Q. Besides -- strike that.
Besides reading part of the complaint --
3
A. Uh-huh.
4
Q. -- when you first received the Subpoena?
5
A. Yes.
6
Q. Have you investigated the veracity of
7
8
9
Plaintiffs' claims at all?
A. I didn't.
And I alluded to earlier, having
counsel and discussing it more precluded me from
10
feeling the need to do a bunch of further sweeping.
11
Q. And you continued to use Facebook after you
12
learned about the suit?
13
A. Yes.
14
Q. And you continued to send Facebook messages
15
16
17
after learning about the suit?
A. Possibly with URLs, but I'm not -- I don't
recall specifically, but my behavior did not change.
18
Q. And why did your behavior not change?
19
A. I saw no reason for it to, I guess.
20
Q. Why did you see no reason for it to change?
21
A. I -- I guess, based on prior use, my new
22
understanding of the general nature of the litigation
23
didn't force me into thinking I needed to change
24
behavior based on the way I've always used it.
25
Q. Do you know whether Facebook has stopped the
Page 136
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
conduct the Plaintiffs are challenging?
2
MR. SLADE:
3
calls for speculation.
4
Objection to the extent it
THE WITNESS:
I don't.
I don't know the --
5
the full extent.
I've alluded to I'm not aware of
6
the full extent, so no.
7
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
8
A. I do not know.
9
Q. If Facebook hasn't stopped the conduct that
You don't know?
10
Plaintiffs are challenging, would that affect whether
11
you use Facebook or not?
12
MR. SLADE:
Object to form, object to the
13
extent it calls for speculation.
14
THE WITNESS:
It wouldn't, it hasn't since
15
then.
16
I fully know the extent of the claim to be able to
17
completely answer that.
18
behavior, so that -- that should show something.
19
And, again, I would refer to that I don't feel
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
But it hasn't changed my
Do you understand that when
20
you send a Facebook message, Facebook has electronic
21
processes in place to process the message?
22
MR. SLADE:
23
THE WITNESS:
Object to form.
I don't know how the
24
underpinnings work other than assume there's some
25
kind of underpinning.
Page 137
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
story when I link something if that's what you're --
2
yes.
3
Q. It is.
4
A. Yes.
5
(Whereupon,
Deposition
6
Exhibit 8 was marked for identification and made part
7
of the record.)
8
9
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
the reporter
has handed you a document we've marked as Exhibit 8.
10
I'll represent to you that this is not a document
11
that has been produced in this case.
12
generated what I just referenced is a URL preview,
13
and this is a screen shot of a URL preview.
14
15
My team and
Does this preview functionality look familiar to
you?
16
A. Yes.
17
Q. Do you recall seeing any URL previews when
18
19
you have sent a Facebook message?
A. Yeah.
And I'll say I am aware of these in
20
that I try to remove them, the -- the actual URL when
21
I'm sharing something on my wall because the story is
22
there, it can be linked to, it's -- it's unnecessary
23
information.
24
Q. So, you --
25
A. I am aware of it because I have a fairly
Page 147
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
standard practice of taking that off when I'm sharing
2
a link on my wall -- or timeline I mean.
3
Q. So, you have a standard practice for removing
4
the URL preview when you post a story on your
5
Facebook timeline?
6
A. If -- yeah, when I'm sharing a news story or
7
a link on my timeline, if I see -- which I don't
8
always see one nice like that.
9
preview, it looks good, I remove the URL itself,
10
11
12
But if I see a
because it's -- it's just repetitive information.
Q. Do you have a standard practice of removing
the URL preview when you send a Facebook message?
13
A. I don't know that I apply that same -- I
14
don't know that it matches up with -- I'm aware of it
15
in the public sharing because of the way it looks to
16
others.
17
18
19
Q. Do you specifically recall sending a message
and leaving a URL preview intact?
A. Yeah.
And I know I've done that on -- on
20
several direct messages over time.
It's less of an
21
issue.
22
if I've noticed it, but it's -- it's something I do
23
generally when sharing, and I realized, you know,
24
it's different with a -- well, in direct messages
25
it's not as big a deal because I'm not sharing it on
But I assume I've probably taken it off, too,
Page 148
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
2
3
4
my timeline.
Q. And you specifically recall removing a URL
preview when you sent a message?
A. I assume I probably have since I do that, you
5
know, on my public timeline, I guess, anyway, but I
6
know that I've sent several that I didn't do that
7
because I -- you know, I wasn't worried with the way
8
it looked.
9
10
Q. Do you understand that Facebook has copies of
messages sent through Facebook on its servers?
11
MR. SLADE:
12
Object to form.
THE WITNESS:
I'm aware of my messages
13
privy to this case, so, yes, you know, to that
14
extent.
15
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
Do you think it's helpful
16
for you to have copies of your messages accessible to
17
you when and if you need them?
18
MR. SLADE:
19
THE WITNESS:
Object to form.
I could see benefit, but it's
20
not a -- a huge priority and honestly I guess people
21
have different uses for archived messages.
22
23
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
Did you ever go back and
access your Facebook messages?
24
A. Very rarely do I re-read old communications.
25
Q. You have?
Page 149
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
2
3
A. Very rarely.
I have, I'm sure, at some
point, but very rarely do I backtrack.
Q. Are you aware that Facebook's developer page
4
disclosed that the number of likes on a third-party
5
page is derived in part from the number of Facebook
6
messages containing a URL to that page?
7
MR. SLADE:
8
THE WITNESS:
9
Object to form.
I had no idea.
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
Do you personally object to
10
Facebook processing messages in order to increase the
11
like count on a third-party website?
12
MR. SLADE:
13
Object to form.
THE WITNESS:
I don't have an opinion about
14
it, and, honestly, to form one, I would want more
15
information about it.
16
enough to say.
17
I don't feel I'm knowledgeable
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
If you knew that the like
18
count on the third-party website was an aggregate and
19
anonymous count, would you object to Facebook
20
processing a message in order to increment that
21
aggregate and anonymous like count?
22
MR. SLADE:
23
THE WITNESS:
Object to form.
I -- I can't say because I
24
don't know the extent of the practices what pros and
25
cons, you know, are -- are a part of each of the
Page 150
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
interests and things to some extent of what your
2
other public profile would be, but they're totally
3
different.
4
putting yourself out there, to marketers, you know,
5
businesses.
6
there's certain expectations; you want retail
7
merchandise.
8
than calling the Wal-Mart and asking for something
9
specific.
You're sharing one with everyone, you're
When you -- when you go into Wal-Mart,
I mean, it's -- it's a different animal
So, I -- I would just assume that the
10
practices of -- would be different to represent the
11
differences in the -- the user's expectations, I
12
guess.
13
14
15
16
17
Q. Do you personally object to Facebook
processing messages for any purpose?
MR. SLADE:
Object to form, and object to
the extent it's been asked and answered.
THE WITNESS:
Do I personally object to
18
Facebook -- describe what you're asking.
19
Processing --
20
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
21
message for any reason?
22
MR. SLADE:
23
THE WITNESS:
For Facebook to process that
Same objections.
Nothing -- my objections lie
24
in the descriptions I've said before as far as user
25
expectations being projective in curbing illegality
Page 154
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
to some extent or the extent practical, only in -- I
2
guess in those ways.
3
expectation, though, should -- Facebook should take
4
that into account.
5
The -- the realm of
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
Okay.
So, do you think that
6
Facebook should be able to process messages in order
7
to deliver the message to an intended recipient?
8
9
MR. SLADE:
Object to form and to the
extent it's been asked and answered.
10
THE WITNESS:
I guess process, I don't know
11
if that means grabbing and passing along or keeping
12
and reviewing or categorizing, organizing.
13
know what process means in this -- in this context.
14
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
I don't
If Facebook has a series of
15
steps that it takes electronically to deliver a
16
message to an intended recipient, do you object to
17
that?
18
MR. SLADE:
19
THE WITNESS:
Object to form.
Beyond it being delivered as
20
written to the intended target, if public -- if the
21
way you treat this information, the timeline, is the
22
same as you treat the -- the information not meant to
23
be shared with anyone but one person, I -- I would
24
have strong reservations in not differentiating the
25
two.
Page 155
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
2
A. The extent of my objections would be based on
3
4
Okay.
knowing the policy completely.
Q. So, you say "beyond it being delivered as
5
written to the intended target".
6
object to Facebook having a series of electronic
7
steps in order to deliver the message to the intended
8
recipient?
9
MR. SLADE:
So, you don't
Objection, mischaracterizes
10
prior testimony, object to form, and object to the
11
extent it's been asked and answered.
12
THE WITNESS:
13
delivery.
14
entails.
15
I -- I don't object with the
You say steps?
I don't know what that
don't know.
So, if step 2 is some -- you know, I -- I
16
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
Okay.
17
A. If it takes three steps to do the one action
18
I've described, then I guess in theory that could be
19
fine, but I don't know enough about the process to
20
say --
21
Q. Okay.
22
A. -- one way or the other.
23
Q. So, do you personally object to Facebook
24
processing messages to -- to filter messages into
25
folders?
Page 156
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
2
MR. SLADE:
asked and answered.
3
4
Object to form, objection,
THE WITNESS:
I object to -- to processing
that goes beyond basic delivery functions.
5
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
6
A. On -- on private messages versus, you know,
7
public shares, I suppose.
8
9
Okay.
Q. So, that would include Facebook processing
messages in order to store them?
10
MR. SLADE:
11
Object to form.
THE WITNESS:
It's -- it's -- yes --
12
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
Okay.
13
A. -- I would object to that.
Again, not
14
knowing what processing means or storing, I don't
15
completely know what that encompasses, whether it's
16
placing it there to never be seen again or to be
17
acted upon in some way.
18
opinion.
19
That would change my
Q. So, if Facebook were processing messages in
20
order to block malware, you would still object to
21
that?
22
23
24
25
MR. SLADE:
Object to form, object to the
extent it's been asked and answered.
THE WITNESS:
User expectations should be
considered in any of those decisions.
Page 157
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
described, it was probably half and half that were or
2
were not, I would say 10 percent of the overall
3
probably based on that estimate.
4
5
6
Q. Do you recall the first time you saw a URL
preview in a Facebook message?
A. I don't recall or have any idea what the
7
actual date was.
I do remember vaguely it being
8
something that wasn't originally part of direct
9
messaging that later became part of it.
I -- I was
10
aware of it on my timeline and using it there before
11
I ever thought to use it in that -- in that way.
12
it may have just been a -- a product of the time of
13
the rollout.
14
And
Q. We might have covered this, too, but do you
15
recall how many times you saw a URL preview in a
16
Facebook message?
17
18
A. Just on messages I've shared or links I've
shared or just --
19
Q. How about the messages you've shared?
20
A. I'd say -- I mean, that's hard to put a
21
number on.
22
shared, I would say a strong 75 to 90 percent of them
23
utilized the preview feature and delete the actual
24
written URL in the way I described earlier.
25
If I've -- of all the URLs or links I've
Q. Do you know if there's a way to go back and
Page 184
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
check to see if there was a URL preview generated for
2
a particular message?
3
A. Not specifically.
I -- if -- if someone
4
tasked me with that, I would just kind of
5
chronologically scroll down to find examples of it.
6
I assume it remained in the same form that you posted
7
it as, is my assumption.
8
9
10
11
Q. And you testified earlier that you've seen
URL previews in a message and have deleted that
preview before sending the message.
Is that correct?
A. I think I might have misspoke.
I deleted the
12
URL link, the actual HTTP address.
13
the preview.
14
address when I'm sending that, because I know
15
clicking on the little, you know, aesthetically
16
pleasing button gets you to the same place and it
17
looks uncluttered.
18
19
I didn't delete
I want the preview, not the actual web
Q. Understood.
So, when you deleted the URL --
20
A. Uh-huh.
21
Q. -- the actual preview which includes the
22
image was intact?
23
A. Yes.
24
Q. Is that correct?
25
A. That would have been my intention if I were
Page 185
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
deleting it, was to delete it and take out the extra
2
information.
3
4
5
Q. And you have done that before; you've left
the URL preview intact before?
A. It's a standard practice on my timeline that
6
I mostly have incorporated on direct messages, too,
7
but to a far lesser extent.
8
Q. Do you know if there's a way to know for sure
9
whether you saw a URL preview in a message before you
10
11
12
sent it?
A. I -- when I share my timeline, I can say that
I always wait and expect it.
13
Q. Uh-huh.
14
A. But I'm aware -- because of some of the --
15
like if I write an article that's in PDF, that there
16
-- it doesn't provide that preview.
17
my timeline shares that there are differences.
18
the extent of the differences I don't know.
19
specifically PDFs won't generate the same thing
20
because I've tried that.
21
not share it at all or I'll -- you know, I'll do it
22
differently, but I'm aware that -- of the...
23
So, I do know on
Now,
I know
And in that case I might
Q. And, besides PDFs, do you recall any other
24
types of documents that will not generate a URL
25
preview?
Page 186
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
A. I know I've run into some over time, but I'm
2
not aware of a particular type that never does or
3
something.
4
Q. So, in the instances where you saw a URL
5
preview in a message, what was your understanding of
6
how that was generated?
7
A. I would, you know, make the comparison to the
8
WordPress blogging, in that if I enter this series of
9
characters in this way, it'll generate a digital
10
product based on that.
11
process is -- is somewhat at play here.
12
I assume that same basic
Q. So, when you saw a URL preview in a message,
13
you assumed that there was some basic process at play
14
to generate it?
15
A. Some sort of automated type digital aspect
16
that I wasn't necessarily manipulating but that had
17
been structured in a way that would make it easy for
18
a user to do what I wanted to do.
19
20
Q. Do you consider that process of automatically
generating the URL preview to be scanning?
21
MR. SLADE:
22
Object to form.
THE WITNESS:
I really don't know.
That's
23
-- that's where my knowledge probably ends, is how
24
that happens.
25
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
And generating the URL
Page 187
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
preview occurs before you send the message.
2
MR. SLADE:
3
THE WITNESS:
Correct?
Object to form.
Yeah.
Because I'll wait
4
until I see it, make sure it's what I want, and then
5
delete, then send.
6
third or fourth step of the process, I guess.
7
So, the send would be like the
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
I believe you testified
8
earlier that you've used several different browsers
9
to access Facebook?
10
A. (Nods head).
11
Q. Is that right?
12
A. Uh-huh.
13
Q. And those browsers include Internet Explorer,
14
Yes.
Mozilla and Chrome --
15
A. Yes.
16
Q. -- am I correct?
17
A. Yes.
18
Q. Any others?
19
A. I guess the Safari iPhone app maybe, you
20
know, very infrequently if somehow I'm redirected to
21
a Facebook page off of something else, but usually
22
I'm in Facebook on my phone.
23
Chrome would probably make up 85, 95 percent of
24
Facebook use because the other two browsers are
25
work-specific for certain -- certain functions, so...
And I'll say the Google
Page 188
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
2
Q. Do you know if those different browsers had
JavaScript enabled?
3
A. I couldn't tell you one way or the other.
4
Q. Would you know how to check?
5
A. I could probably find out, but the answer is
6
7
no.
Q. Would you able to check to see if JavaScript
8
were enabled on all of the browsers you've used since
9
you signed up for Facebook?
10
11
12
MR. SLADE:
Objection, calls for
speculation.
THE WITNESS:
Yeah.
I'm -- I'm -- I'm not
13
familiar enough with JavaScript to really understand
14
what it is, how to search for it, how to know it's
15
there short of going specifically to look for it if I
16
were given a reason.
17
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
How many of the websites at
18
the URLs contained in your messages contained like
19
button social plug-ins?
20
MR. SLADE:
21
THE WITNESS:
Object to form.
My guess is the type of
22
information I share are -- are kind of, you know, a
23
lot of political news.
24
to be big commercial sites that almost entirely have
25
those type of features as part of it.
So, those type of sites seem
We've got CNN
Page 189
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
as the other example, but that would be a common link
2
for me.
3
commercial site that I'm sharing, so most would have
4
those type of...
5
6
Usually it's a -- a fairly well-known
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
like button social plug-in?
7
MR. SLADE:
8
THE WITNESS:
9
Would some not have had a
Object to form.
Perhaps some of the ones I
referred to that don't generate the preview.
I'm
10
thinking I can -- like I'm involved with American
11
Association of Law Libraries, things from their
12
website tend to not be able to be replicated, so that
13
could be one example of one of the ones I would know
14
that's probably not that I might share, you know,
15
somewhat frequently.
16
well-known and well-frequented websites that -- that
17
do have those functions.
18
But generally it's pretty
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
Do you have an estimate of
19
the number of websites that have a like button social
20
plug-in versus those that did not have a like button
21
social plug-in?
22
A. That I've shared, at least three out of four
23
would have been from a commercial site with a button,
24
probably more.
25
Q. Do you know whether your sharing of a URL in
Page 190
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
sharing.
2
the sharing.
3
out loud here, it's -- some way there's a connection
4
in that it -- it generates a box asking you to share,
5
but I know out of practice that I cannot share it and
6
still have a like.
7
way around, too, that one doesn't necessarily trigger
8
the other even though they're interrelated.
9
You know, liking is a separate action than
I guess the way it's set up, thinking
So, I assume it works the other
Q. After you shared a URL in a Facebook message,
10
have you ever gone back to the website associated
11
with that URL and seen the like count go up based on
12
your sharing of that URL in a Facebook message?
13
MR. SLADE:
Object to form.
14
THE WITNESS:
Only if I actually went
15
through with that last step I described in the
16
previous answer and shared it.
17
then shared, two actions, and knew that the like
18
count was affected.
19
just shared a URL and had the like count affected or
20
-- or hit like and expected it to -- to also post a
21
status update to my timeline.
22
that way, but I could be wrong.
23
So, I've liked and
I've never, to my knowledge,
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
I don't think it works
You've never shared a URL in
24
a Facebook message and gone to the website associated
25
with that URL and seen your name associated with a
Page 192
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
like count on that website?
2
MR. SLADE:
Object to form.
3
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
4
A. No.
5
Q. -- URL in a Facebook message?
6
A. The only way I've seen that or would look for
7
8
9
If you only shared that --
that is if I had purposely liked it.
Q. Do you object to a like count on a
third-party website that's a anonymized and
10
aggregated meaning it only displays the number of
11
people who liked the page as opposed to the specific
12
names of individuals who liked the page?
13
MR. SLADE:
14
THE WITNESS:
Object to form.
On its face without any
15
question about the way that it's gathered, I don't
16
have necessarily a strong opinion either way, but I
17
-- I don't necessarily disagree with the practice.
18
do see benefit in knowing who liked it as -- as far
19
as the overall theme of sharing information with
20
people and, you know, shared -- people and -- and
21
businesses that you have a mutual interest with.
22
That's the -- the reason for that, I would think, to
23
identify people.
24
feelings about being anonymous besides the way it's
25
gathered.
But I don't have any negative
Page 193
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
I
CONFIDENTIAL
1
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
To summarize, you don't know
2
whether your sharing of a particular URL in a
3
Facebook message incremented the like count on a
4
third-party website.
5
6
7
Is that right?
A. That's -- I don't know, and my understanding
is they're two separate actions, so...
(Whereupon,
Deposition
8
Exhibit 9 was marked for identification and made part
9
of the record.)
10
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
the reporter
11
has handed you a document marked as Exhibit 9.
12
will represent to you that this document is Plaintiff
13
Matthew Campbell's Corrected Objections and Responses
14
to Defendant Facebook, Inc.'s, First Set of
15
Interrogatories in this case.
16
I
Do you recognize this document?
17
A. First time I've ever seen it.
18
Q. Please turn to Exhibit 1 of this exhibit
19
which is right after page 15.
20
using this for a little while so you'll just want to
21
keep this handy.
22
(Whereupon,
And we're going to be
Deposition
23
Exhibit 10 was marked for identification and made part
24
of the record.)
25
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
the reporter
Page 194
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
A. I don't know for sure.
I assume it does.
2
The fact it's in 2014, this group has been around, I
3
-- my assumption is that it does, but I really do not
4
know.
5
(Whereupon,
Deposition
6
Exhibit 11 was marked for identification and made part
7
of the record.)
8
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
I'll
9
represent to you that this is a printout of the
10
website associated with the URL you sent in the
11
message we're discussing.
12
printout?
13
14
Do you recognize this
A. The details of the story, you know, I'm -I'm a little foggy on them.
15
16
17
18
Q. And you see that this web page does have a
like button social plug-in.
Correct?
19
A. Yes, there at the top.
20
Q. Do you know if this like count increased on
21
this website after you sent your Facebook message to
22
Mr. Campbell?
23
MR. SLADE:
24
THE WITNESS:
25
Object to form.
Based on my previous answers,
my understanding is that the share -- whether it be
Page 201
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
on a timeline or in a direct message, the shared link
2
is an independent action of a pressed like button.
3
So, I may have liked it and shared it as two actions.
4
I very well may have shared it without liking it.
5
don't, however, think that the sharing triggered the
6
like if -- if it did.
7
been unbeknownst to me because that's not how I
8
understand that -- that to take place.
9
10
I
And if it did, that would have
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
Understood.
So, to see if I understand your position
11
correctly, your understanding is that if you shared a
12
URL in a message, that the like count on a
13
third-party website would not go up --
14
A. Correct.
15
Q. -- based solely on the sharing of that URL in
16
a Facebook message?
17
A. Correct.
18
Q. Okay.
Do you know how you can check to see
19
if the like button on a third-party website went up
20
based on your sharing of a URL to that website in a
21
message?
22
MR. SLADE:
23
THE WITNESS:
Object to form.
If I had only shared it, not
24
liked it, I wouldn't be interested in finding out.
25
But the way I would have -- would go about it if
Page 202
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
asked were -- would be just to go back to original
2
page, look at the like button to see if users are
3
identified and see if I'm one of them.
4
5
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
Do you see users identified
on this web page by the like button count?
6
A. No.
7
Q. Okay.
8
You can set that aside.
Going back to the chart, if you could take a look
9
at item number 329.
Do you see that?
10
A. Yes, ma'am.
11
Q. And can you refer in Campbell000052 to the
12
fourth full message down that correlates to that
13
item?
14
A. Yes.
15
Q. Do you see that?
16
A. Yes, I do.
17
Q. Now, this appears to be a message from you to
18
Matt Campbell on January 18th, 2014 at 9:08 p.m. CST.
19
Do you see that?
20
A. Yes.
21
Q. And there is a URL in that chart as well?
22
A. Yes.
23
Q. And do you see that same URL reflected in
24
25
Exhibit 10?
A. I do.
Page 203
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
2
Q. And you don't recall if you had JavaScript
enabled at that time?
3
A. No, I'm not aware.
4
Q. Now, for this site, do you recall if it --
5
6
strike that.
Do you know if this website had a Facebook like
7
button social plug-in?
8
A. I do not know.
9
And, yeah, it's -- I don't
know and I'll say that it appears to be a little
10
different than the way I was describing sites earlier
11
in that I -- it doesn't appear to be a big commercial
12
site or heavily frequented site.
13
something pretty targeted and specific.
14
(Whereupon,
It appears to be
Deposition
15
Exhibit 12 was marked for identification and made part
16
of the record.)
17
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
I'll
18
represent to you that Exhibit 12 is a printout of the
19
document available at the URL in message 329.
20
A. Okay.
21
Q. Do you see a like button social plug-in on
22
this document?
23
A. No.
24
Q. And when you refer back to the actual URL in
25
the message, you will see that the URL ends with a
Page 207
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
THE WITNESS:
I believe he probably didn't
2
consider it at the time and probably assumed, you
3
know, any -- any concerns were a part of the general
4
policy agreement he originally signed.
5
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
So, you don't know what
6
Mr. Campbell knew about Facebook's practices with
7
respect to possibly processing this message?
8
9
A. I can't tell you what he knew or didn't know
at the time.
I can refer back to the fact that his
10
subsequent behavior and previous doesn't seem to
11
change a lot, so, if there was a concern, it didn't
12
seem to affect the way he engaged others on here.
13
Q. Do you know if you saw a URL preview
14
15
associated with this particular message?
A. This is one that I -- I couldn't tell you.
16
You know, I had the PDF example to -- to lean on in
17
differentiating.
18
would have been generated or not.
19
Facebook photo, so I'm -- I'm not aware.
20
This one I'm not sure if a preview
It appears to be a
Q. Because you don't know if you saw a URL
21
preview, you wouldn't know if you had closed it or
22
left it intact before sending it.
23
Is that correct?
A. Based on the printouts here, I can't tell the
24
difference.
25
of it.
And my -- I don't have any recollection
And generally I don't know if these type of
Page 211
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
Q. And if the terms disclosed that Facebook was
2
processing messages, would you agree that you did
3
consent?
4
MR. SLADE:
Object to form, object to the
5
extent it calls for speculation, object to the extent
6
it's been asked and answered, and object to the
7
extent it calls for a legal conclusion.
8
9
10
THE WITNESS:
Will you repeat the question?
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
Sure.
And if Facebook's terms did disclose that Facebook
11
was processing messages, would you agree that you
12
consented to Facebook processing the message?
13
MR. SLADE:
14
Same objections.
THE WITNESS:
Under the context of my
15
signing or by clicking "agree", I am held by all of
16
the provisions laid -- laid there out.
17
understanding and fine reading of them, you know, is
18
beside the point to that extent.
19
20
21
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
My
Understood.
Now, do you know if Mr. Campbell consented to
Facebook processing the message?
22
MR. SLADE:
23
THE WITNESS:
Object to form.
I think the same as the
24
answers before and the ones immediately prior in that
25
he didn't consider it at the time, but he did agree
Page 217
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
to a general overall policy that may have contained
2
language pertaining to that specific point.
3
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
Same question for
4
Mr. Campbell.
5
Facebook was processing messages at the time, do you
6
believe Mr. Campbell would have consented to Facebook
7
processing this message?
8
9
If Facebook's terms disclosed that
MR. SLADE:
Object to form, object to the
extent it's been asked and answered, object to the
10
extent it calls for a legal conclusion, object to the
11
extent it calls for speculation.
12
THE WITNESS:
Trying to surmise what he
13
would have done if given that information, that's
14
beyond what I can do.
15
done given the information, but I can't answer that.
16
I can say what I might have
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
Do you know what
17
understanding Mr. Campbell had at the time about what
18
Facebook was doing with messages?
19
MR. SLADE:
Object to form, object to the
20
extent it calls for speculation.
21
THE WITNESS:
I don't think he was
22
considering where or what was being done with these
23
particular messages, so I -- I guess not.
24
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
25
A. No.
Do you know?
I mean, there was no discussion between
Page 218
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
he and I about the nature of where these messages
2
went or what happened to them beyond our just reading
3
them as they came in.
4
5
Q. Do you know if Mr. Campbell saw a URL preview
before sending this message to you?
6
MR. SLADE:
Object to form, object to the
7
extent it calls for speculation.
8
THE WITNESS:
9
My recollection is that
Mr. Campbell is actually probably less concerned
10
about removing the URL and leaving the preview as I
11
am.
12
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
Why is that?
13
A. It's just a quirky thing about me probably
14
more than anything.
15
that his standard practice wasn't like mine in that
16
he always deleted the URL or anything.
17
he did -- really thought about it either way.
18
19
20
I would -- my recollection is
Q. Are you positive for this particular URL
though?
A. No, not --
21
MR. SLADE:
22
THE WITNESS:
23
MR. SLADE:
24
25
I don't think
Object to form.
Sorry.
Sorry.
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
And you don't know what kind
of browser Mr. Campbell was using when he sent this
Page 219
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
somewhat illustrates the fact that whatever
2
reservations aren't precluding the particular action
3
you're asking about.
4
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
And for people you sent
5
messages to, you wouldn't be able to state whether --
6
strike that.
7
You don't know if the people you sent messages to
8
ever visited the Facebook developer page that said
9
that URL attachments and Facebook messages
10
11
incremented the like count on a third-party website?
MR. SLADE:
Object to form, object to the
12
extent it calls for speculation.
13
THE WITNESS:
I'm unaware of any individual
14
user doing that or knowing that, and -- and in saying
15
that, there are a lot of lawyers and pretty educated
16
people in these circles and I would think even
17
amongst that type of population that it's the same as
18
it is in the general population.
19
crusaders that it's an important issue to, but
20
overall I don't think it's considered.
21
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
There may be a few
And you wouldn't be able to
22
say whether those individuals ever saw articles or
23
other press coverage regarding Facebook's processing
24
of messages?
25
MR. SLADE:
Object to form, object to the
Page 230
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
extent it calls for speculation.
2
THE WITNESS:
3
Not that I'm aware.
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
And without actually going
4
and accessing the URL included in a message you sent
5
to see if it had a like button social plug-in, there
6
wouldn't be any way for you to say for certain
7
whether that website had a like button social
8
plug-in.
9
Is that correct?
A. That's --
10
MR. SLADE:
11
Object to form.
THE WITNESS:
That's correct.
Even the
12
ones like I had mentioned with
13
the fact that it does generally, I mean, to know with
14
absolute certainty for an older story, I would have
15
to manually go and view it.
16
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
And to say for certain
17
whether a URL preview was associated with a
18
particular URL included in a message, you would have
19
to go back and actually access your physical Facebook
20
messages?
21
A. Yes.
22
MR. SLADE:
23
THE WITNESS:
24
25
Object to form.
Yes.
And then -- then view
it as on the -- the Facebook site itself.
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
Okay.
We're done with these
Page 231
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
to what you say you've learned today?
2
MR. SLADE:
3
THE WITNESS:
4
5
Object to form.
I can't speculate.
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
Do you think you're going to
continue to use Facebook?
6
A. Yes.
7
Q. Do you think you're going to continue to use
8
9
10
11
12
13
Facebook messages?
A. Yes, but I have a new curiosity that probably
didn't exist before.
Q. Do you think you've been harmed by Facebook's
conduct challenged in this case?
MR. SLADE:
Object to form, object to the
14
extent it calls for speculation, and object to the
15
extent it calls for a legal conclusion.
16
THE WITNESS:
I'm not aware of a direct
17
negative impact front and center in my life.
18
However, if I knew about practices and -- I didn't
19
know every exchange with Matt Campbell had been made
20
subject to a litigation discovery process until this
21
was brought to my attention, so, you know, all of it
22
will make me think about it a little differently.
23
Maybe I don't want years of archived messages between
24
me and -- and certain people.
25
affect my future behavior.
You know, it may
Page 248
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
2
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
Do you think you've suffered
any monetary harm?
3
MR. SLADE:
Object to the form of the
4
question, object to the extent it calls for
5
speculation, object to the extent it calls for a
6
legal conclusion.
7
THE WITNESS:
I can't quantify it here
8
today, but, you know, if -- if -- I could see how
9
people -- I could have been negatively impacted as
10
far as the practice engaged in towards me and -- and
11
people in my situation.
12
at a deposition, I mean, you could quantify that I
13
guess.
14
concerned about it shows that I haven't felt or
15
wasn't aware of any direct negative impact in my
16
day-to-day dealings.
17
Amendment, communications with local officials and
18
those things are a part of my life and will be in the
19
future, so more awareness and curiosity about these
20
issues could change my behavior because of the type
21
of people I do communicate with.
As far as, you know, hours
But my telling you I hadn't been previously
However, social media, First
22
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
And you said that you intend
23
to continue to use Facebook?
24
A. Yes.
25
Q. Do you think you'll suffer any harm from your
Page 249
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
A. I'm sorry.
2
Q. Do you believe that your Facebook messages
3
have monetary value?
4
MR. SLADE:
Object to the form of the
5
question, object to the extent it calls for
6
speculation, object to the extent it calls for a
7
legal conclusion.
8
9
THE WITNESS:
I'd like to say that some of
my higher-end posts have some, but, you know,
10
generally no, other than they promote -- help me
11
promote my career generally, but, no, not a direct
12
monetary gain.
13
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
Do you have any information
14
of any kind that Facebook has targeted an ad to you
15
based on something you've put in a message?
16
17
MR. SLADE:
Object to the form, object to
the extent it calls for speculation.
18
THE WITNESS:
I don't spend much time
19
looking at ads.
I can say that over time I've
20
wondered why one was there and -- and -- you know,
21
and other times I see the same one that does kind of
22
fit.
23
the way that even works but I haven't thought about
24
it very much.
25
those particular ads other than just minor annoyance,
So, it's been a very surface-level glance of
I haven't been negatively impacted by
Page 251
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
2
I suppose.
Q. (By Ms. Rogers)
But have you ever seen an ad
3
specifically and believed that Facebook targeted it
4
to you based on something you put in a message?
5
A. I'll have to say I kind of described -- and
6
I'll repeat it again.
And I'll even, you know, bring
7
up G-mail again, in that when I browse the internet,
8
in my mind, that was a very different thing that
9
direct messaging, whether it be Facebook Messenger, a
10
direct message on Twitter, an e-mail.
My
11
understanding of those practices, those weren't the
12
marketing -- the information wasn't -- advertising
13
information wasn't garnered from that; it was
14
garnered from public internet use.
15
different, my understanding of it was, you know,
16
off-base.
17
been under the assumption that's was based solely on
18
public use, whether it was Facebook or Google.
19
Perhaps my Google ads are based on my G-mail use,
20
which I'm sure there's a theme between public
21
information shared and private to some extent.
22
Politics, law, education, I'm interested in that.
23
I'll be interested in direct messages, too, but at no
24
time did I ever think that was based on private
25
messages whether it was Facebook or any of the other
If that's
And by seeing targeted ads, I've always
Page 252
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
platforms.
2
Q. I want to discuss your reading habits a
3
little bit, although we've covered that to some
4
degree already.
5
Do you read any newspapers?
A. I wouldn't say I read any of them A to Z, but
6
I read constant news articles and pieces of
7
newspapers every day.
8
Q. Do you read the Los Angeles times?
9
A. Some.
10
It's a favorite link but not -- maybe
once a week.
11
Q. How about the New York Times?
12
A. More frequently.
13
I'd say three or four times
a week I read at least a story or two.
14
Q. How about the Wall Street Journal?
15
A. That's kind of odd that -- they have web
16
videos, an app I like.
17
Times, LA Times, they have little two-minute video
18
versions of their stories, and that's become a go-to
19
in the last several months.
20
featured on my thing for that.
21
it, I may see a story, then read it, or vice versa,
22
but all three of those publications.
23
24
25
Wall Street Journal, New York
All three of those are
So, if I don't read
Q. Understood.
I'm going to ask you about some other publications
online or otherwise.
Let me know if you read them or
Page 253
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
have ever read them.
2
Have you ever read Business
Insider?
3
A. A few stories but it's not a go-to source.
4
Q. How about Forbes.com?
5
A. I picked up a magazine in the airport and
6
read the whole thing a couple of weeks ago in Philly,
7
the Forbes, an issue, but generally no other than a
8
story link here or there.
9
10
Q. How about Huffington Post?
A. It's not a go-to either.
I tend to shy away
11
from the ultra partisan news these days, and I'll --
12
I'll definitely read or share or repost a really good
13
story or a link that I'm interested in, but it's not
14
a source I seek and then it's shared.
15
Q. I'm sensing a theme.
16
A. A lot of links.
17
Q. How about Huffington Post Tech?
18
A. Even less than the -- the mother ship there
19
on that one.
20
Q. How about CNet?
21
A. Less.
22
Only in links and stuff.
It's not one
of the go-tos either.
23
Q. But you have read it?
24
A. I'm aware of it.
25
Q. And you've read it?
Page 254
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
2
3
A. I've read -- it's online.
of it online at times, but sporadically.
Q. You mentioned you sometimes read the Wall
4
Street Journal.
5
Digits blog.
6
7
I've read stories
How about the Wall Street Journal
Ever read that?
A. I don't -- I've never -- I don't recall that
one right now.
8
Q. How about Mashable?
9
A. I'm aware of it, a link or two over time, but
10
not a source I usually --
11
Q. Wired?
12
A. I've heard of it but not -- not that familiar
13
with it.
14
Q. Tech Radar?
15
A. Not familiar with that one at all.
16
Q. The Next Web?
17
A. No.
18
Q. PC Mag?
19
A. No.
20
Q. Gizmodo?
21
A. No.
22
Q. CNN?
23
A. Frequently.
24
Q. The Guardian?
25
A. Linked stories sporadically.
Usually video.
Page 255
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
Q. Tech Spot?
2
A. No.
3
Q. The Wall?
4
A. Not familiar with that one.
5
Q. Daily Tech?
6
A. No.
7
Q. Stack Overflow?
8
A. Not familiar with that one.
9
Q. Inside Facebook?
10
A. Never heard of that one.
11
Q. Slate?
12
A. Occasional linked stories.
13
Q. CNN Tech?
14
A. I -- I frequent CNN sites a lot, its home
15
site and some of its subsites like CNN Monday, CNN
16
Tech, yeah.
17
Q. Consumerist?
18
A. Very rarely.
19
It's -- we have a print
subscription to that one, so occasionally.
20
Q. Julian Evans Blog?
21
A. No.
22
Q. Social Times?
23
A. No.
24
Q. The Verge?
25
A. No.
Page 256
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
Q. Web Pro News?
2
A. Not familiar.
3
Q. Motherboard?
4
A. No.
5
Q. BBC?
6
A. Occasionally.
7
Q. NPR?
8
A. I frequently listen to -- and -- and -- yeah,
9
and read the -- the online local website.
10
Q. Thank you.
11
12
Well read, just as I thought a librarian should
be.
13
A. How would I post all that stuff?
14
Q. I have no idea.
15
16
17
MS. ROGERS:
Those are all -- actually all
of the questions I have.
Do you have anything?
18
MR. SLADE:
19
MS. ROGERS:
I don't think so.
Okay.
Well, I want to thank
20
you for your time and for sitting for this deposition
21
and, of course, for your professionalism throughout
22
the process.
23
(Record concluded, 3:10 p.m.)
24
25
Page 257
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
CONFIDENTIAL
1
CERTIFICATE
2
3
I, Cheryl D. Glenn, Certified Shorthand Reporter,
4
Registered Professional Reporter, certify that the
5
above-named witness was sworn, that the deposition was
6
taken in shorthand and thereafter transcribed; that it
7
is true and correct; and that it was taken on
8
August 11, 2015, in Little Rock, county of Pulaski,
9
state of Arkansas, pursuant to Subpoena and the
10
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and under the
11
stipulations set out, and that I am not an attorney
12
for nor relative of any of said parties or otherwise
13
interested in the event of said action.
14
15
16
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand
and official seal this 24th day of August, 2015.
17
18
19
20
21
22
____________________________
23
CHERYL D. GLENN, CSR, RPR
24
Certificate No. 1448
25
Page 259
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?