Campbell et al v. Facebook Inc.

Filing 219

NOTICE of Refiling re Motion to Compel Discovery and Supporting Documents by Matthew Campbell, Michael Hurley re 218 Order on Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Replacement for Dkt. 205-4, # 2 Exhibit 2 - Replacement for Dkt. 205-6, # 3 Exhibit 3 - Replacement for Dkt. 205-8, # 4 Exhibit 4 - Replacement for Dkt. 205-10, # 5 Exhibit 5 - Replacement for Dkt. 205-12, # 6 Exhibit 6 - Replacement for Dkt. 205-16, # 7 Exhibit 7 - Replacement for Dkt. 205-17, # 8 Exhibit 8 - Replacement for Dkt. 205-18, # 9 Exhibit 9 - Replacement for Dkt. 205-19, # 10 Exhibit 10 - Replacement for Dkt. 205-15, # 11 Exhibit 11 - Replacement for Dkt. 205-21)(Gardner, Melissa) (Filed on 10/18/2016) Modified on 10/19/2016 (kcS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
EXHIBIT 9 ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 ) HURLEY, and DAVID SHADPOUR, 5 MATTHEW CAMPBELL, MICHAEL ) on behalf of themselves and ) all others similarly situated, ) 6 ) Plaintiffs, 7 ) vs. ) 8 No. 4:13-cv-05996-PJH ) FACEBOOK, INC., 9 ) ) Defendants. ) ) 10 11 12 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY 13 14 VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF MIKE VERNAL 15 Palo Alto, California 16 Wednesday, September 30, 2015 17 18 19 20 21 Reported by: 22 JANIS JENNINGS, CSR, CLR, CCRR 23 Job No. 2144892 24 25 Pages 1 - 227 Page 1 Veritext Legal Solutions 866 299-5127 ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY 1 BY MR. CARNEY: 13:28 1 running the product. 2 Q. Yeah, I'm not asking about the system. 13:28 3 A. Sure. 4 Q. I'm simply asking the question, and "I don't 13:28 13:31 2 3 A. I would probably call it Facebook. 4 13:28 Q. Is there a name for that software? 13:31 Q. And appreciating that you -- and I don't 13:31 13:31 5 know" is certainly an appropriate answer. But is an 13:28 5 want you speculating about how the software or 6 object created by Facebook when a URL attachment is 13:28 6 system works with respect to the URL attachment. 7 successfully created? 7 A. Okay. 8 Q. I'm asking specifically about the software 13:31 8 MR. JESSEN: Same objections. Asked and 9 answered. 10 13:28 13:28 13:28 Q. When a URL attachment is successfully 13:31 10 notation, record, logging, et cetera, made in the 13:31 11 Open Graph when a URL attachment is successfully 13:28 12 created? 13 A. I would have to speculate. I don't know. 14 the Open Graph? 14 Q. How would you go about discovering the 13:29 15 MR. JESSEN: Object to the form. 13:29 16 THE WITNESS: I would have to guess as to 13:29 13:29 Q. What system are you referring to? 20 A. The software. 21 Q. Which software? 22 24 13:29 19 13:29 13:29 13:31 13:32 21 22 13:29 MR. JESSEN: Objection. Vague. THE WITNESS: It would be fair to say that I 13:32 13:32 23 oversaw the Open Graph team at some point. 13:29 24 BY MR. CARNEY: 25 Q. At what point? Page 126 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 13:31 13:31 Q. Is it fair to say that you oversee 20 Facebook's Open Graph? Q. And which -- when you use the term "here," 13:29 25 what are you referring to? 13:31 13:31 A. I would presumably have to read a lot of 18 source code. A. Presumably the software that processes that 13:29 23 is in question here. 16 need? 17 19 13:31 15 answer to that question? What information would you 13:31 13:29 18 BY MR. CARNEY: 13:31 13:31 13 created, is any representation of that act logged on 13:29 17 how the system works. 13:31 13:31 9 system, that is, the Open Graph. Is there any THE WITNESS: Yeah. I would have to guess. 13:28 11 BY MR. CARNEY: 12 13:28 13:31 A. I believe -- pardon me. I believe you're 13:29 asking me about lines 20 to 25 and that seems to 13:29 describe -- that seems to describe some interaction 13:29 around how messages work and I presume that is a 13:30 piece of software, and I don't know how that piece 13:30 of software works. 13:30 Q. And I'm asking about -- what software runs 13:30 the Open Graph? 13:30 MR. JESSEN: Object to the form. 13:30 THE WITNESS: Yeah. That's -- that's not -- 13:30 we -- we spoke earlier about different 13:30 manifestations of the Open Graph. Which -- which 13:30 manifestation are you referring to? 13:30 BY MR. CARNEY: 13:30 Q. Any. 13:30 A. Well, so no software -- so one of the 13:30 manifestations was the Open Graph team so I don't 13:30 know what software runs the team. Another 13:30 manifestation was the protocol, and I don't know -- 13:30 like many pieces of software could run the protocol. 13:30 Q. Okay. What was the third one? What was 13:30 number one? 13:30 A. The product. 13:30 Q. Uh-huh. A. And I would describe Facebook software as 13:30 13:32 13:32 13:32 Page 128 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 A. From its inception until we stopped 13:32 referring to it as like its own thing. 13:32 Q. Okay. So what is the date of inception? 13:32 A. I'm not certain. 13:32 Q. Can you give me a rough estimate? 13:32 A. I would -- somewhere in the -- I -- if I had 13:32 to guess, I would guess somewhere in the 2009 to 13:32 2010 range. 13:32 Q. And when did you stop referring to it as 13:32 "its own thing"? 13:33 A. Again, I would have to guess, but I think 13:33 sometime in, say, 2014. 13:33 Q. And why did you stop referring to it as "its 13:33 own thing"? 13:33 A. The team evolved. 13:33 Q. How did it evolve? 13:33 A. We -- as I recall, we merged that team with 13:33 another team and then the combined team took on a 13:33 new name. 13:33 Q. And what's the new name? 13:33 A. People, Places, and Things. 13:33 Q. What team did the Open Graph team combine 13:33 with? 13:33 A. The Identity team. 13:33 Q. Who runs the People, Places, and Things team 13:34 Page 127 Page 129 33 (Pages 126 - 129) Veritext Legal Solutions 866 299-5127 ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY 1 Q. All right. I'll expand the question. How 17:10 2 about any of the addressees there, do you recall any 17:10 3 response to this email? 17:10 4 17:10 A. I have no recollection. 5 MR. CARNEY: Okay. Thanks. That's it. 6 MR. JESSEN: Okay. 17:10 7 MR. CARNEY: All right. 8 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We are off the record. 17:10 17:10 9 The time is 5:11, and this concludes today's 17:10 17:10 10 testimony given by Mike Vernal. The total number of 17:10 11 media used is four and will be retained by Veritext 17:10 12 Legal Solutions. Thank you. 13 14 (Ending time: 5:11 p.m.) 17:11 17:11 * * * 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 226 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 I, JANIS JENNINGS, CSR No. 3942, Certified Shorthand Reporter, certify: That the foregoing proceedings were taken before me at the time and place therein set forth, at which time the witness was duly sworn by me; That the testimony of the witness, the questions propounded, and all objections and statements made at the time of the examination were recorded stenographically by me and were thereafter transcribed; That the foregoing pages contain a full, true and accurate record of all proceedings and testimony. Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 30(e)(2) before completion of the proceedings, review of the transcript [ ] was [X] was not requested. I further certify that I am not a relative or employee of any attorney of the parties, nor financially interested in the action. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated this 13th day of October 2015. <%signature%> JANIS JENNINGS, CSR NO. 3942 CLR, CCRR Page 227 58 (Pages 226 - 227) Veritext Legal Solutions 866 299-5127

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?