DiTirro v. Facebook, Inc.

Filing 25

STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Deadline to File Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Defendant's Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition filed by Katy A. Bresler, Anthony DiTirro, Michelle Shumate. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Friedman, Todd) (Filed on 4/28/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6

ANTHONY J. ORSHANSKY, Cal. Bar No.199364
[e-mail]
JUSTIN KACHADOORIAN, Cal. Bar No. 260356
[e-mail]
COUNSELONE, P.C.
9301 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 650
Beverly Hills, California 90210
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

TODD M. FRIEDMAN, Cal. Bar No. 216752
[e-mail]
NICHOLAS J. BONTRAGER, Cal. Bar No. 252114
[e-mail]
LAW OFFICES OF TODD M. FRIEDMAN, P.C.
369 S. Doheny Drive, Suite 415
Beverly Hills, California 90211
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[Other Counsel on signature page]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated

15
16
17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18
19
20
21

ANTHONY DITIRRO, KATYA
BRESLER, AND MICHELLE
SHUMATE, on behalf of themselves and
all others similarly situated ,

22

Plaintiffs,

23

v.
24
25
26
27

FACEBOOK, INC.,
Defendant.
_________________________________

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 5:14-cv-00132-PJH

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
DEADLINE TO FILE PLAINTIFFS’
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS AND
DEFENDANT’S REPLY

________________________________

28

Stipulation to Continue Deadline

1

COMES NOW, Plaintiffs and Defendant, by and through respective

2
3
4
5

counsel, to hereby stipulate to continue the deadline for Plaintiffs to file their
Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and Defendant’s Reply to
Plaintiffs’ Opposition.

6
7
8

WHEREAS, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint on
April 15, 2014.

9
10
11
12

WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is
due to be filed by April 29, 2014.
WHEREAS, Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition is due to be filed

13
14
15

by May 6, 2014.
WHEREAS, the parties have stipulated to enlarge the time to file the

16
17
18

Opposition and Reply briefs.
WHEREAS, no previous modifications have been requested regarding this

19

matter.
20
21
22

WHEREAS, the parties request that the Court grant short extensions of
time to file the Opposition and Reply to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss.

23
24
25

NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated by the parties that Plaintiffs’
Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss shall be due by May 13, 2014 and

26
27
28

Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiffs’ Opposition shall be due by May 27, 2014.
SO STIPULATED.

Stipulation to Continue Deadline

1
2
3

DATED: April 28, 2014

The Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C.
s/ Todd M. Friedman_________________
Todd M. Friedman, Esq.
Attorney for Plaintiffs

4
5
6
7

DATED: April 28, 2014

Cooley LLP

8
9
10

s/ Jeffrey M. Gutkin__________________
Jeffrey M. Gutkin, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Stipulation to Continue Deadline