Daggett v. Unknown

Filing 4

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 3/11/14. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CLARENCE LEROY DAGGETT, 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 UNKNOWN, 14 Defendant. 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 14-0459 LHK (PR) ORDER OF DISMISSAL 16 On January 30, 2014, plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a letter which commenced this 17 action. The same day, the clerk notified plaintiff that he had not paid the filing fee, nor had he 18 filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). The clerk also notified plaintiff that he 19 failed to submit a complaint. Along with the deficiency notices, plaintiff was provided with a 20 new IFP application and instructions for completing it. Plaintiff was further cautioned that his 21 failure to either file a completed IFP application or pay the filing fee within twenty-eight days 22 would result in the dismissal of this action. In addition, plaintiff was advised that his failure to 23 file a complaint within twenty-eight days would result in the dismissal of this action. To date, 24 plaintiff has not paid his filing fee, filed a completed IFP application, or filed a complaint. 25 Thus, the instant action is DISMISSED without prejudice. 26 The clerk shall enter judgment and close the file. The clerk is also directed to send an 27 electronic copy of plaintiff’s original letter (docket no. 1), and a copy of this order to the 28 courtroom deputy of Judge Thelton Henderson. Order of Dismissal P:\PRO-SE\LHK\CR.14\Daggett459disifpcomp.wpd 1 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 3/11/14 LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Order of Dismissal P:\PRO-SE\LHK\CR.14\Daggett459disifpcomp.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?