Daggett v. Unknown
Filing
4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 3/11/14. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
CLARENCE LEROY DAGGETT,
11
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
UNKNOWN,
14
Defendant.
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. C 14-0459 LHK (PR)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
16
On January 30, 2014, plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a letter which commenced this
17
action. The same day, the clerk notified plaintiff that he had not paid the filing fee, nor had he
18
filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). The clerk also notified plaintiff that he
19
failed to submit a complaint. Along with the deficiency notices, plaintiff was provided with a
20
new IFP application and instructions for completing it. Plaintiff was further cautioned that his
21
failure to either file a completed IFP application or pay the filing fee within twenty-eight days
22
would result in the dismissal of this action. In addition, plaintiff was advised that his failure to
23
file a complaint within twenty-eight days would result in the dismissal of this action. To date,
24
plaintiff has not paid his filing fee, filed a completed IFP application, or filed a complaint.
25
Thus, the instant action is DISMISSED without prejudice.
26
The clerk shall enter judgment and close the file. The clerk is also directed to send an
27
electronic copy of plaintiff’s original letter (docket no. 1), and a copy of this order to the
28
courtroom deputy of Judge Thelton Henderson.
Order of Dismissal
P:\PRO-SE\LHK\CR.14\Daggett459disifpcomp.wpd
1
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:
3/11/14
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Order of Dismissal
P:\PRO-SE\LHK\CR.14\Daggett459disifpcomp.wpd
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?