Taylor v. Muniz et al

Filing 55

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE SUR-REPLY. Signed by Judge Honorable Lucy H. Koh on 6/29/2016. (sms, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2016) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/29/2016: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (sms, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TERRY TAYLOR, United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 Case No. 14-cv-05016 LHK (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE SUR-REPLY v. 13 14 15 W.L. MUNIZ, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a California state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed an amended civil rights action 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff has 19 filed an opposition, and defendants have filed a reply. In support of defendants’ reply, defendants 20 submitted evidence that was not introduced in their motion for summary judgment. Thus, plaintiff 21 has not had an opportunity to respond to this new evidence. 22 Defendants request that plaintiff be given an opportunity to respond to their reply. 23 Defendants’ request is granted. Plaintiff may, but is not required to, file a sur-reply no later than 24 July 13, 2016. On July 13, 2016, defendants’ motion will be deemed submitted for decision. 25 26 Case No. 14-cv-05016 LHK (PR) ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE SUR-REPLY 27 1 28 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 DATED: 6/29/2016 3 4 LUCY H. KOH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Case No. 14-cv-05016 LHK (PR) ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE SUR-REPLY 27 2 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?