Quansah v. United States Postal Service et al
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for lack of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Clerk shall close this file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 1/21/2016. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2016) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/21/2016: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (ecg, COURT STAFF).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
KENNETH B. QUANSAH,
Case No. 5:15-cv-02571-EJD
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, et
On January 6, 2016, the court issued an order to show cause which required Plaintiff
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Kenneth B. Quansah (“Plaintiff”), by January 15, 2016, to file an amended complaint or otherwise
demonstrate good cause in writing why this case should not be dismissed after Plaintiff failed to
file an amended complaint by the deadline originally imposed. See Docket Item No. 54. The
court advised Plaintiff that this action would be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 41(b) if he did not timely comply as directed.
On January 15, 2016, Plaintiff filed a document entitled “Plaintiff’s Motion in Opposition
to U.S. Postal Service Motion to Dismiss Complaint.” See Docket Item No. 55. The court has
liberally construed that document, but does not find it in accord with the instructions provided by
the court. Accordingly, as of the date and time this order was filed, Plaintiff has not complied
with the January 6th order and this case remains without a complaint.
Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for lack of prosecution
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Clerk shall close this file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 21, 2016
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
Case No.: 5:15-cv-02571-EJD
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?