Ayala v. Grant et al

Filing 8

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO PROVIDE COURT WITH MORE INFORMATION FOR DEFENDANT T. PETERSON re 7 Mail Returned. It is hereby ordered that Plaintiff shall provide the court with an accurate and current location for defendant T. Peterson by 2/18 /2016 or plaintiff's claims against this defendant will be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the F.R.C.P.. The Litigation Coordinator at San Quentin State Prison (SQSP) shall provide either a current employment address for th e defendant or a forwarding address, or notice that such information is not available. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to plaintiff and the Litigation Coordinator at SQSP. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 1/19/2016. Clerk mailed copy of this order upon plaintiff and the Litigation Coordinator at SQSP on 1/20/2016. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(amkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RONALDO AYALA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
DR. J. GRANT, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. C 15-3037 RMW (PR)
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF
TO PROVIDE COURT WITH
MORE INFORMATION FOR
DEFENDANT T. PETERSON

Plaintiff, a California state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil action in state court.

18

Defendants filed a notice of removal to federal court because plaintiff’s complaint indicated that

19

he was filing a lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Liberally construing plaintiff’s complaint,

20

the court found cognizable claims of excessive force, retaliation, and deliberate indifference to

21

serious medical needs. On November 6, 2016, a notice of lawsuit and request for waiver of

22

service of summons was mailed to defendant T. Peterson at San Quentin State Prison. On

23

December 10, 2015, the documents were returned with a notation that the defendant was no

24

longer worked at the institution. (Docket No. 7.) Accordingly, defendant T. Peterson has not

25

been served.1

26
27
28

1

Defendant T. Amrhein-Conama has not returned an executed waiver of summons
however no information has been provided to the court indicating that the documents sent to him
were undeliverable.
Order Directing Plaintiff to Provide Court with More Info. for Def. RN T. Peterson
P:\PRO-SE\RMW\CR.15\Ayala037moreinfo-Peterson.wpd

1

Although a plaintiff who is incarcerated and proceeding in forma pauperis may rely on

2

service by the Marshal, such plaintiff “may not remain silent and do nothing to effectuate such

3

service”; rather, “[a]t a minimum, a plaintiff should request service upon the appropriate

4

defendant and attempt to remedy any apparent defects of which [he] has knowledge.” Rochon v.

5

Dawson, 828 F.2d 1107, 1110 (5th Cir. 1987). Here, plaintiff’s complaint has been pending for

6

over 90 days, and thus, absent a showing of “good cause,” is subject to dismissal without

7

prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).

8
9

Because plaintiff has not provided sufficient information to allow the Marshal to locate
and serve defendant T. Peterson, plaintiff must remedy the situation or face dismissal of his

10

claims against this defendant without prejudice. See Walker v. Sumner, 14 F.3d 1415, 1421-22

11

(9th Cir. 1994) (holding prisoner failed to show cause why prison official should not be

12

dismissed under Rule 4(m) where prisoner failed to show he had provided Marshal with

13

sufficient information to effectuate service). Accordingly, plaintiff must provide the court with

14

an accurate and current location for defendant T. Peterson such that the Marshal is able to effect

15

service.

16
17

CONCLUSION
1.

Plaintiff shall provide the court with an accurate and current location for

18

defendant T. Peterson within thirty (30) days of the date this order is filed, or plaintiff’s claims

19

against this defendant will be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal

20

Rules of Civil Procedure.

21

2.

In the interest of justice, the court requests that the Litigation Coordinator at San

22

Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”) determine if defendant T. Peterson is still employed with the

23

California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”), and if so, to provide the

24

court with a current employment address for the defendant. If he is a former employee but no

25

longer employed with CDCR, the Litigation Coordinator is requested to provide a forwarding

26

address, or notice that such information is not available.

27
28

3.

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to plaintiff and the Litigation

Coordinator at SQSP.
Order Directing Plaintiff to Provide Court with More Info. for Def. RN T. Peterson
2
P:\PRO-SE\RMW\CR.15\Ayala037moreinfo-Peterson.wpd

1
2
3

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: 1/15/2016
RONALD M. WHYTE
United States District Judge

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Order of Service; Directing Defendants to File Disposition Motion
3
P:\PRO-SE\RMW\CR.15\Ayala037moreinfo-Peterson.wpd