Owens v. California Director of Corrections

Filing 6

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Steven L. Owens. It is hereby ordered that: The Clerk shall serve by mail a copy of this order and the petition and all attachments upon respondent and respondent's a ttorney, the Attorney General of the State of California, and the Clerk shall also serve a copy of this order on the petitioner; Respondent's answer to petition is due 3/12/2016, if petitioner wishes to respond to the answer, petitioner shall fi le and serve a traverse 30 days of the date the answer is filed; Respondent may file a motion to dismiss on procedural grounds in lieu of an answer by 3/12/2016, petitioner's opposition or statement of non-opposition is due 28 days from the dat e the motion is filed and respondent shall file and serve a reply within 14 days of the date any opposition is filed. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 1/11/2016. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(amkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN L. OWENS, 11 Petitioner, 12 v. 13 RON DAVIS, Warden, 14 Respondent. 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 15-4968 RMW (PR) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 17 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has paid the filing fee. The court orders respondent to show cause 18 why a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted. 19 DISCUSSION 20 A. Standard of Review 21 This court may entertain a petition for writ of habeas corpus “in behalf of a person in 22 custody pursuant to the judgment of a state court only on the ground that he is in custody in 23 violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a); Rose 24 v. Hodges, 423 U.S. 19, 21 (1975). 25 A district court shall “award the writ or issue an order directing the respondent to show 26 cause why the writ should not be granted, unless it appears from the application that the 27 applicant or person detained is not entitled thereto.” 28 U.S.C. § 2243. 28 Order to Show Cause P:\PRO-SE\RMW\HC.15\Owens968osc.wpd 1 B. 2 Petitioner’s Claim As grounds for federal habeas relief, petitioner alleges that he was denied due process in 3 conjunction with his 2012 rules violation, resulting in his placement into administrative 4 segregation and loss of time credits. Liberally construed, the court orders respondent to show 5 cause why the petition should not be granted. 6 CONCLUSION 7 1. The clerk shall serve by mail a copy of this order and the petition and all 8 attachments thereto upon the respondent and the respondent’s attorney, the Attorney General of 9 the State of California. The clerk shall also serve a copy of this order on the petitioner. 10 2. Respondent shall file with the court and serve on petitioner, within sixty days of 11 the date this order is filed, an answer conforming in all respects to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing 12 Section 2254 Cases, showing cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted. 13 Respondent shall file with the answer and serve on petitioner a copy of all portions of the 14 underlying state criminal record that have been transcribed previously and that are relevant to a 15 determination of the issues presented by the petition. 16 17 If petitioner wishes to respond to the answer, she shall do so by filing a traverse with the court and serving it on respondent within thirty days of the date the answer is filed. 18 3. Respondent may file a motion to dismiss on procedural grounds in lieu of an 19 answer, as set forth in the Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 20 2254 Cases within sixty days of the date this order is filed. If respondent files such a motion, 21 petitioner shall file with the court and serve on respondent an opposition or statement of non- 22 opposition within twenty-eight days of the date the motion is filed, and respondent shall file 23 with the court and serve on petitioner a reply within fourteen days of the date any opposition is 24 filed. 25 4. It is petitioner’s responsibility to prosecute this case. Petitioner is reminded that 26 all communications with the court must be served on respondent by mailing a true copy of the 27 document to respondent’s counsel. Petitioner must keep the court and all parties informed of any 28 change of address by filing a separate paper captioned “Notice of Change of Address.” She must Order to Show Cause P:\PRO-SE\RMW\HC.15\Owens968osc.wpd 2 1 comply with the court’s orders in a timely fashion. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal 2 of this action for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 1/11/2016 RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Order to Show Cause P:\PRO-SE\RMW\HC.15\Owens968osc.wpd 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?