Osolinski v. County of Sonoma et al
Filing
14
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REINSTATE CASE 13 ; VACATING ORDER OF DISMISSAL AND JUDGMENT; REOPENING CASE. The Clerk is ordered to vacate the 10/31/2017 Order of Dismissal and Judgment 11 and 12 and reopen this case. Amended Petition due by 2/8/ 2018. The Clerk shall include 2 copies of the court's form petition, a copy of the Court's order filed on 9/26/2017 10 with a copy of this order. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 1/11/2018. NOTE: Mailed 2 copies of form petition, copy of order 10 and this order upon petitioner by AMK. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(amkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
DAVID N. OSOLINSKI,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
Petitioner,
v.
13
14
15
16
Case No. 17-02689 EJD (PR)
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
REINSTATE CASE; VACATING
ORDER OF DISMISSAL AND
JUDGMENT; REOPENING CASE
COUNTY OF SONOMA, et al.,
Respondents.
(Docket No. 13)
17
18
Petitioner, a state prisoner, filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus
19
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On September 26, 2017, the Court dismissed the petition
20
with leave to amend to provide information regarding the exhaustion of state judicial
21
remedies. (Docket No. 10.) Petitioner was given twenty-eight days from the date the
22
order was filed to file an amended petition. (Id.) Because the deadline passed without any
23
response from Petitioner, the Court dismissed the instant action on October 31, 2017, for
24
failure to file an amended petition. (Docket No. 11.)
25
Petitioner has filed a request to vacate order the dismissal and judgment, which the
26
Court construes as a request to reinstate this action. (Docket No. 13.) Petitioner asserts
27
that he never received the Court’s order of dismissal with leave to amend, and that if he
28
had, he would have immediately prepared and filed an amended petition. (Id. at 2.)
1
Accordingly, in the interest of justice, Petitioner’s motion to vacate the dismissal and
2
reinstate this action is GRANTED.
3
CONCLUSION
4
5
For the foregoing reasons, the Court orders as follows:
6
1.
7
8
9
The Clerk is ordered to vacate the October 31, 2017 Order of Dismissal and
Judgment, (Docket Nos. 11 and 12), and reopen this case.
2.
Petitioner shall file an amended petition using the court’s form petition, and
provide therein information regarding the exhaustion of state judicial remedies. If
Petitioner has not exhausted state judicial remedies, the petition must be dismissed for
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
failure to exhaust. The amended petition shall be filed no later than twenty-eight (28)
12
days from the date this order is filed.
13
The Clerk shall include two copies of the court’s form petition, a copy of the
14
Court’s order filed on September 26, 2017, (Docket No. 10), with a copy of this order to
15
Petitioner.
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
1/11/2018
Dated: _____________________
________________________
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Order Granting Motion to Reinstate; Vacating Dismissal and Judgment
P:\PRO-SE\EJD\HC.17\03121Ochoa_reopen.docx
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?