Chiprez v. Muniz
Filing
10
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 10/12/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(iym, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
FROYLAN CHIPREZ,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
Case No. 17-CV-04829 LHK (PR)
Petitioner,
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
v.
13
14
M.L. MUNIZ,
Respondent.
15
16
On August 18, 2017, petitioner, proceeding pro se, initiated this proceeding by filing a
17
motion for an extension of time to file a federal petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28
18
U.S.C. § 2254. That same day, the court sent a notification to petitioner, informing him that he
19
did not pay the filing fee, nor did he file a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis
20
(“IFP”). The court provided petitioner with a blank IFP application, along with a return envelope,
21
and a notification that the case would be dismissed if petitioner failed to pay the fee, or file a
22
completed application with supporting documentation within twenty-eight days. More than
23
twenty-eight days have passed and petitioner has not paid the filing fee, nor has he filed a
24
completed application to proceed IFP.
25
Thus, the instant action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The clerk shall terminate all
26
27
28
Case No. 17-CV-04829 LHK (PR)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
1
1
2
pending motions, enter judgment, and close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
DATED:
10/12/2017
4
LUCY H. KOH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 17-CV-04829 LHK (PR)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?