Hohenberg v. Ferrero USA, Inc

Filing 145

MOTION to Vacate Judgment and for Indicative Ruling by Courtney Drey, Andrea Pridham. (Attachments: # 1 Memo of Points and Authorities Motion to Vacate Judgment, # 2 Exhibit Ex A - Order in Unilever case, # 3 Exhibit Ex B - Order in Yelp case, # 4 Exhibit Ex C - Judge Whelan Order re Weston)(Pridham, Grenville) (ag).

1
2
3

Grenville Pridham
2522 Chambers Road, Suite 100
Tustin, CA 92780
[phone]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Objectors COURTNEY DREY and ANDREA PRIDHAM

4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
IN RE: FERRERO LITIGATION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 3:11-cv-00205-H-KSC
Pleading Type: Class Action
OBJECTORS’ NOTICE OF MOTION AND
MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT
UNDER RULE 60(B), AND FOR AN
INDICATIVE RULING; OR, IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, FOR LEAVE TO
INTERVENE FOR THE PURPOSES OF
FILING THIS MOTION
Judge: The Hon. Marilyn Huff
Hearing: December 3, 2012
Time: 10:30 AM
Location: Courtroom 13

19
20

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

21

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on December 3, 2012 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 13 of the

22

United States District Courthouse for the Southern District of California, which is located at 940 Front

23

St., San Diego, California 91201, Objectors COURTNEY DREY and ANDREA PRIDHAM will, and

24

hereby do, respectfully move the Court for an Order vacating judgment under rule 60(b), and for an

25

indicative ruling; or, in the alternative, for leave to intervene for the purposes of filing this motion.

26

///

27

///

28
Page 1 of 2

In re Ferrero Litigation, Case No. 3:11-cv-00205-H-KSC
Objectors’ Motion to Vacate Judgment under Rule 60(b), and for an Indicative Ruling; Or, in the
Alternative, for Leave to Intervene for the Purposes of Filing this Motion

1

This motion is based on this Notice, Objectors’ supporting Memorandum of Points and Authorities,

2

the pleadings and papers on file in this action, any replies in support of the motions, and on such oral and

3

documentary evidence and argument as may be presented at the time of the hearing.

4

DATED: November 5, 2012.

5
6
7
8
9

/s/ Grenville Pridham
Grenville Pridham
2522 Chambers Road, Suite 100
Tustin, CA 92780
[phone]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Objectors Drey and Pridham

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 2 of 2

In re Ferrero Litigation, Case No. 3:11-cv-00205-H-KSC
Objectors’ Motion to Vacate Judgment under Rule 60(b), and for an Indicative Ruling; Or, in the
Alternative, for Leave to Intervene for the Purposes of Filing this Motion