Hohenberg v. Ferrero USA, Inc

Filing 94

RESPONSE TO SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING by Ferrero USA, Inc re 92 Supplemental Briefing Pursuant to Order at Hearing. (Attachments: # 1 Proof of Service)(Eggleton, Keith)(ag).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 KEITH E. EGGLETON, State Bar No. 159842 COLLEEN BAL, State Bar No. 167637 DALE R. BISH, State Bar No. 235390 AMIR STEINHART, State Bar No. 275037 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: (650) 493-9300 Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 E-mail: keggleton@wsgr.com Attorneys for Defendant FERRERO U.S.A, INC. 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 In re FERRERO LITIGATION 13 14 15 16 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: 11 CV 0205 (H CAB) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE CASE NO.: 11-CV-0205 4587947 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 I, Keith E. Eggleton, declare: 3 I am employed in the County of Santa Clara, State of California. I am over the age of 4 eighteen years and not a party to the within action; my business address is 650 Page Mill Road, 5 Palo Alto, California 94104-1050. 6 On November 9, 2011, I served the following documents: 7 1. DEFENDANT FERRERO U.S.A., INC.’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’ SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY (PURSUANT TO ORDER AT HEARING); AND 2. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. 8 9 10 via the Court’s Electronic Filing System on the registered parties shown on the court’s service 11 list by posting such documents electronically to the ECF website of the United States District 12 Court for the Southern District of California. 13 14 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at Palo Alto, California on November 9, 2011. 15 16 17 By: /s/Keith E. Eggleton Keith E. Eggleton 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE CASE NO.: 11-CV-0205 -2- 4587947

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?