Hangingout, Inc. v. Google, Inc.

Filing 35

REPLY to Response to Motion re 23 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Google, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Lodgment of Non-Electronic Exhibit, # 2 Declaration of Margret M. Caruso, # 3 Exhibit 1 to Caruso Declaration, # 4 Exhibit 2 to Caruso Declaration, # 5 Proof of Service)(Caruso, Margaret)(cge).

Download PDF
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Margret M. Caruso (Bar No. 243473) Cheryl A. Galvin (Bar No. 252262) 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor 3 Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139 Telephone: (650) 801-5000 4 Facsimile: (650) 801-5100 2 5 Attorneys for Defendant Google Inc. 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 HANGINOUT, INC, Plaintiff, 14 15 vs. 16 GOOGLE INC., 17 Defendant. CASE NO. 13-CV-2811 AJB NLS DECLARATION OF MARGRET M. CARUSO IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLE’S REPLY MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLE’S MOTION TO DISMISS HANGINOUT’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 18 19 ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED 20 Date: April 25, 2014 Time: 2:00 p.m. Courtroom 3B Judge: Hon. Anthony J. Battaglia 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 13-CV-2811 AJB NLS -1DECLARATION OF MARGRET M. CARUSO IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLE’S REPLY MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLE’S MOTION TO DISMISS HANGINOUT’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 I, Margret M. Caruso, declare as follows: 2 1. I am a member of the bar of the State of California and of this Court, 3 and a partner at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, attorneys for Google Inc. 4 in this action. I make this declaration of personal, firsthand knowledge, and if 5 called and sworn as a witness, I could and would testify competently thereto. 6 2. Attached as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of a printout from the 7 webpage http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/06/introducing-google-project-real8 life.hmtl, reflecting Google’s June 28, 2011 announcement of Google+ and 9 Hangouts. This document was attached as Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Matthew 10 Leske In Support of Google’s Opposition to Hanginout’s Motion for Preliminary 11 Injunction (“Leske Declaration”), found at Dkt. 30-19. This is a full-color version 12 of the document attached as Exhibit 22 to the Declaration of Justin Malone In 13 Support of Plaintiff Hanginout, Inc.’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction, found at 14 Dkt. 12-26. 15 3. Google’s June 28, 2011 announcement also had an embedded video 16 demonstrating how Hangouts works. Like the videos for other products announced 17 in connection with Google + that day, the video was labeled “Google+” followed by 18 a colon, and then the name of the product it was demonstrating. Attached as 19 Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of the Hangouts video embedded in Google’s 20 June 28, 2011 announcement. This video was also attached as Exhibit 2 to the 21 Leske Declaration, found at Dkt. 30-20 and lodged as a non-electronic exhibit. 22 23 24 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of 25 America that the foregoing is true and correct. 26 27 28 Case No. 13-CV-2811 AJB NLS -2DECLARATION OF MARGRET M. CARUSO IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLE’S REPLY MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLE’S MOTION TO DISMISS HANGINOUT’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 2 Executed on April 4, 2014, at Redwood Shores, California. 3 4 5 By /s/ Margret M. Caruso Margret M. Caruso 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 13-CV-2811 AJB NLS -3DECLARATION OF MARGRET M. CARUSO IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLE’S REPLY MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLE’S MOTION TO DISMISS HANGINOUT’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?