Pulse Electronics, Inc. v. U.D. Electronic Corp.

Filing 177

CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: The Court enters judgment in Defendants favor as to Plaintiffs three counts in the Second Amended Complaint seeking relief for direct, induced, and contributory infringement of the Patents-in-Suit as well as Defendants counterclaims for non-infringement. See ECF No. 108. Given the Court did not address the validity of any of Plaintiffs Patents-in-Suit, Defendants counterclaims raising invalidity are dismissed as moot in light of the Courts determination that Defendant has not infringed the Patents-in-Suit. Defendant is the prevailing party. (Attachments: # 1 1)(mme)

Download PDF
United States District Court SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA See attachment Civil Action No. 18-cv-00373-BEN-DEB Plaintiff, V. JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE See attachment Defendant. Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: The Court enters judgment in Defendant’s favor as to Plaintiff’s three counts in the Second Amended Complaint seeking relief for direct, induced, and contributory infringement of the Patents-in-Suit as well as Defendant’s counterclaims for non-infringement. See ECF No. 108. Given the Court did not address the validity of any of Plaintiff’s Patents-in-Suit, Defendant’s counterclaims raising invalidity are dismissed as moot in light of the Court’s determination that Defendant has not infringed the Patents-in-Suit. Defendant is the prevailing party. Date: 3/31/21 CLERK OF COURT JOHN MORRILL, Clerk of Court By: s/ M. Exler M. Exler, Deputy

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?