Pure Research Products, L.L.C. v. Allergy Research Group, Inc. et al

Filing 134

Minute Entry - Courtroom Minutes for Jury Trial Day 1 held on 10/5/2009 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration of Order Allowing FDA Labeling Requirements, filed October 2, 2009 127 . Court clarifies its previous order, limited purpose of evidence as stated on record. (Attachments: # 1 Redacted Strike Sheet) (Reporter FTR - K. Terasaki) (rpmcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch Date: October 5, 2009 Courtroom Deputy: J. Chris Smith FTR Technician: Kathy Terasaki ____________________________________________________________________________ Civil Action No. 06-cv-00381-RPM PURE RESEARCH PRODUCTS, L.L.C., and JOHN A. SICHEL, Plaintiffs, v. ALLERGY RESEARCH GROUP, INC., Defendant. ____________________________________________________________________________ COURTROOM MINUTES ____________________________________________________________________________ Trial to Jury Day One 8:30 a.m. Court in session. Rick Edwards Robert J. Enders, Jr. Richard A. Marsh William G. Knapp, III Court's preliminary remarks. Court states its trial procedures. 8:40 a.m. Jurors present. Court's preliminary remarks to jurors. Court's statement of the case to jurors. All jurors sworn for voir dire. Court voir dires jurors. Court excuses for cause jurors: 100195392 100193898 100190611 October 5, 2009 06-cv-00381-RPM 100186749 100167152 10:52 a.m. to 10:55 a.m. Voir dire continued. Plaintiffs' challenges: 100176030 100186104 100181393 Defendant's challenges: 100197620 100185795 100191668 Twelve jurors selected to try the case: 100197044 100179735 100189039 100161966 100176664 100179422 100168463 100177922 100192697 100181392 100183457 100161805 Court instructs jurors. Jurors excused. ORDERED: Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration of Order Allowing FDA Labeling Requirements, filed October 2, 2009 [[127]. Court clarifies its previous order, "limited purpose of evidence" as stated on record. Court in recess. Court in session. Bench conference: with the exception of two additional questions to Juror 100161966, counsel pass jurors for cause. 11:08 a.m. 11:31 a.m. 2 October 5, 2009 06-cv-00381-RPM Jurors present. Twelve jurors sworn to try the case. 11:35 a.m. Plaintiffs' opening statement by Mr. Marsh. Court instructs jurors. Jurors excused. 12:00 p.m. 1:15 p.m. Court in recess. Court in session. Jurors present. Court instructs jurors. 1:19 p.m. 1:55 p.m. Defendant's opening statement by Mr. Edwards. Plaintiffs' witness, Luba Shynkarenko, Ph.D., sworn. Direct examination of Dr. Shynkarenko by Mr. Marsh. Court instructs jurors. Jurors excused. 2:39 p.m. 2:53 p.m. Court in recess. Court in session. Argument by Mr. Marsh regarding Plaintiffs' Exhibits 221, 222, 223 and 224. Argument by Mr. Edwards. ORDERED: Defendant's objection to Plaintiffs' Exhibits 221, 222, 223 and 224 sustained. Jurors present. 3:03 p.m. Continued direct examination of Dr. Shynkarenko by Mr. Marsh. Plaintiffs' Exhibit 43 identified, offered, stipulated and received. Court instructs jurors. Jurors excused. Argument by Mr. Marsh re: Dr. Shynkarenko expert report. 3 October 5, 2009 06-cv-00381-RPM Argument by Mr. Edwards (Defendant's objection). ORDERED: Defendant's objection is sustained (not in report then not in evidence). Jurors present. 3:44 p.m. 3:47 p.m. 4:02 p.m. Continued direct examination of Dr. Shynkarenko by Mr. Marsh. Cross examination of Dr. Shynkarenko by Mr. Edwards. Redirect examination of Dr. Shynkarenko by Mr. Marsh. Bench conference: scheduling. 4:10 p.m. to 4:13 p.m. 4:15 p.m. Plaintiff, John Sichel, sworn. Direct examination of Mr. Sichel by Mr. Knapp. Court instructs jurors. Jurors excused until 9:00 a.m. October 6, 2009. 4:30 p.m. Court in recess. Clerk's Note: Redacted Strike Sheet attached. Trial continued. Total time: min. 6 hrs. 45 min. 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?