Bray et al v QFA Royalties

Filing 23

MOTION for Order to Preserve the Status Quo Pending a Hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction by Defendant QFA Royalties LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Cohen, Fredric)

Bray et al v QFA Royalties

Doc. 23 Att. 1

Case 1:06-cv-02528-JLK

Document 23-2

Filed 12/21/2006

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 06-cv-02528-JKL-CBS CHRISTOPHER BRAY, et al., Plaintiff, v. QFA ROYALTIES LLC, Defendants. ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ Upon consideration of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction ("Motion"), the file in this matter and being advised fully on the premises, it is hereby ORDERED: 1. A hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion is set for __ days commencing on ________. 2. The Defendants' Brief in Opposition is due on or before ________. Plaintiffs' Reply is due on or before _____. 3. The parties are permitted to take certain limited discovery prior to the hearing, as follows: a. Each side may serve 8 requests for production of documents on the other side. The document requests must be served electronically on or before ___ and responded to by ____. b. Each side may take depositions of the other. Defendants may take the deposition of a member of each plaintiff group (the member of the board

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 1:06-cv-02528-JLK

Document 23-2

Filed 12/21/2006

Page 2 of 2

of directors) in Denver at a mutually agreed date and time before _____. Plaintiffs may take the deposition of a corporate representative (pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30 (b) (6) at a mutually agreed date and time within that same time period. 4. Based on Quiznos agreement and representation to the court, it is understood that Quiznos will maintain the status quo ante prior to the terminations of the respective franchise agreements pending the hearing and my decision on Plaintiffs' Motion. In this regard, Quiznos has stayed enforcement of the termination of all franchise agreements in issue and will not take any action, without court approval, to change that status quo ante or otherwise prevent the ongoing operation of the stores. Quiznos has so agreed without waiver or prejudice to its rights and positions with respect to its opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion. Dated December 22, 2006.

______________________________ Senior U.S. District Judge