Netquote Inc. v. Byrd
Netquote Inc. v. Byrd
Page 1 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 07-cv-00630-DME-MEH NETQUOTE INC, a Colorado corporation, Plaint iff, v. BRANDON BYRD, an internet user making use of the IP Addresses 188.8.131.52 and 184.108.40.206, and MOSTCHOICE.COM, INC., a Georgia corporation Defendants. UNOPPOSED MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL
COMES NOW Christopher P. Beall, counsel for Plaintiff NetQuote Inc, and asks that he be allowed to withdraw as counsel for Plaintiff NetQuote Inc on the grounds that he is withdrawing from the partnership of Faegre & Benson LLP to pursue employment with another law firm. Daniel D. Williams and David W. Stark, of Faegre & Benson LLP, will continue to represent NetQuote, Inc in this matter. Pursuant to D. C. Colo. L. Civ. R. 7.1.A, the undersigned states that he conferred by e-mail with counsel for Defendants in this action and is authorized to state Defendants do not oppose this motion.
Page 2 of 3
Dated: May 8 , 2007, By s/ Christopher P. Beall David W. Stark Daniel D. Williams Chr ist opher P. Beall FAEGRE & BENSON LLP 3200 Wells Fargo Center 1700 Lincoln Street Denver, Colorado 80203 Telephone: (303) 607-3500 Facsimile: (303) 607-3600 E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org m Attorneys for Plaintiff NETQUOTE INC
Page 3 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 8th day of May, 2007, I served the foregoing MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL by electronic delivery, as an attachment to an email, to the fo llo wing counsel of record:
Ryan L. Isenberg, Esq. ISENBERG & HEWITT, P.C. 7000 Peachtree Dunwoody Road, Bldg 15, Suite 100 At lanta, Georgia 30328 email@example.com Rachel L. Eichenbaum, Esq. HOLME ROBERTS & OWENS LLP 1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 4100 Denver, Colorado 80203 Rachel.Eichenbaum@hro.com
s/ Tracy Reed
Unopposed MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Plaintiff Netquote Inc.. (Attachments: # 1
Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Beall, Christopher)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?