Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stanford International Bank, Ltd. et al

Filing 1

Copy of ORDER Appointing Ralph S. Janvey of Dallas, Texas as Receiver by United States District Judge Reed O'Connor on 2/16/2009. (Attachments: # 1 Complaint, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet, # 3 Notice of Appearance, # 4 Order 2/16/2009, # 5 Executed TRO, # 6 Receipt, # 7 Transmittal Letter)(llk, )

Download PDF
1500 SAN JACINTO CENTER 98 SAN JACINTO BLVD. AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701 - 4078 TEL +1 512.322.2500 FAX +1 512.322.2501 AUSTIN BEIJING DALLAS DUBAI HONG KONG HOUSTON LONDON MOSCOW NEW YORK PALO ALTO RIYADH WASHINGTON www.bakerbotts.com February 23, 2009 BY EMAIL ATTACHMENT Gregory C. Langham Clerk of the Court U.S. District Court for Colorado Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, Room A105 901 19th Street Denver, CO 80294-3589 Re: Kevin Sadler TEL +1 512.322.2589 FAX +1 512.322.8332 kevin.sadler@bakerbotts.com Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stanford International Bank, Ltd., et al.; Case No. 3-09-cv-00298-L in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division Dear Mr. Langham: On February 17, 2009, the Court filed an order appointing Ralph S. Janvey receiver in the above-referenced case. Property, assets, and/or records that are part of the Receivership Estate are located within your District. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 754 and 1692, find attached the following court papers: (1) Complaint; (2) Temporary Restraining Order, Order Freezing Assets, Order Requiring an Accounting, Order Requiring Preservation of Documents, and Order Authorizing Expedited Discovery; (3) Order Appointing Receiver; (4) Notice of Appearance of Counsel for Receiver, and (5) Order Granting Motion to Add Relief Defendants. Also attached are Form JS-44 and a letter from Susan Ayers authorizing a credit card charge for the $39 filing miscellaneous fee. Sincerely, Kevin Sadler AFY:afy Enclosures

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?