Righthaven LLC v. Uberpix.net et al
Filing
1
COMPLAINT and Demand for Jury Trial against Hetal Jannu and Uberpix.net (Filing fee $ 350, Receipt Number 36414) Summons Issued, filed by Righthaven LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Civil Cover Sheet, # 6 Receipt)(lyg, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No.:_________________________
RIGHTHAVEN LLC, a Nevada limited-liability company,
Plaintiff,
v.
UBERPIX.NET, an entity of unknown origin and nature; and
HETAL JANNU, an individual,
Defendant.
COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
Righthaven LLC (“Righthaven”) complains as follows against Uberpix.net (“Uberpix”)
and Hetal Jannu (“Ms. Jannu”; collectively with Uberpix known herein as the “Defendants”) on
information and belief, and at all times relevant to this lawsuit, unless otherwise specifically
indicated herein to the contrary:
NATURE OF ACTION
1.
This is an action for copyright infringement pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 501.
PARTIES
2.
Righthaven is a Nevada limited-liability company with its principal place of
business in Nevada.
3.
Righthaven is in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State.
4.
Ms. Jannu is identified by the current registrar, GoDaddy.com, Inc. (“GoDaddy”),
as the registrant of the Internet domain found at (the “Domain”).
5.
Ms. Jannu is identified by GoDaddy as the administrative contact and technical
contact of the Domain (the content accessible through the Domain and the Domain itself
collectively known herein as the “Website”).
6.
Ms. Jannu maintains editorial control of the Website, as evidenced by the “Submit
Pix” portion of the Website, attached hereto as Exhibit 1.
7.
Uberpix is an entity of unknown origin and nature.
8.
Attempts to find evidence of the formal organizational status in the respective
Secretary of State offices of Delaware, California, Illinois, Nevada, New York, Texas and
Tennessee demonstrate that, at least with respect to these states, Uberpix is not a formally
organized business entity.
9.
Uberpix is the self-proclaimed owner of the copyright(s) in the work(s) displayed
on the Website, as evidenced by a copyright notice displayed on the Website: “© 2008 – 2010
uberpix.net”.
10.
The Defendants reproduced an unauthorized copy of the photograph entitled:
“TSA Agent performs enhanced pat-downs” (the “Work”), attached hereto as Exhibit 2, and
displayed said unauthorized copy (the “Infringement”), attached hereto as Exhibit 3, on the
Website.
JURISDICTION
11.
This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter and the parties under the
copyright laws of the United States, 17 U.S.C. § 101 et seq., as well as jurisdictional provisions
of 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a).
12.
Righthaven is the owner of the copyright in and to the Work.
13.
On or about November 18, 2010, the Defendants willfully reproduced the Work,
on an unauthorized basis, from a source emanating from Colorado.
14.
On or about after November 18, 2010, the Defendants displayed, and continue to
display, the Infringement on the Website.
15.
The composition, at least in part, of the Work and the Infringement, is a
Transportation Security Administration Agent performing an enhanced pat-down search in the
Denver, Colorado airport.
16.
The focal point of the Infringement is Denver, Colorado.
17.
The only geographic location that is associated with, and related to, the Work is
Denver, Colorado.
18.
The Work was originally published in The Denver Post.
19.
The Defendants knew that the Work was originally published in The Denver Post.
20.
The Defendants knew that the Work originally emanated from Colorado.
21.
The Infringement, as publicly displayed on the Website, was and is accessible to
persons in Colorado.
22.
The Infringement occurred and continues to occur in Colorado.
23.
The Defendants’ display of the Infringement was and is purposefully directed at
Colorado residents.
24.
The harm caused by the Infringement, was experienced, at least in part, in
Colorado.
VENUE
25.
The United States District Court for the District of Colorado is an appropriate
venue, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1400 (a), because the Defendants are subject to personal
jurisdiction in Colorado.
26.
The United States District Court for the District of Colorado is an appropriate
venue, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2), because a substantial part of the events giving rise to
the claim for relief are situated in Colorado.
FACTS
27.
The Work constitutes copyrightable subject matter, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. §
102(a)(5).
28.
Righthaven is the owner of the copyright in and to the Work.
29.
The Work was originally published on or about November 18, 2010.
30.
On December 8, 2010, the United States Copyright Office (the “USCO”) granted
Righthaven the registration to the Work, copyright registration number VA0001751279 (the
“Registration”) and attached hereto as Exhibit 4 is evidence of the Registration in the form of a
printout of the official USCO database record depicting the occurrence of the Registration.
31.
On or about November 18, 2010, the Defendants displayed, and continue to
display, the Infringement on the Website.
32.
The Defendants review each photograph submitted by users of the Website, prior
to reproducing each such photograph on the Website.
33.
The Defendants did not seek permission, in any manner, to reproduce, display, or
otherwise exploit the Work.
34.
The Defendants were not granted permission, in any manner, to reproduce,
display, or otherwise exploit the Work.
CLAIM FOR RELIEF: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
35.
Righthaven repeats and realleges the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 1 through
34 above.
36.
Righthaven holds the exclusive right to reproduce the Work, pursuant to 17
U.S.C. § 106(1).
37.
Righthaven holds the exclusive right to prepare derivative works based upon the
Work, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 106(2).
38.
Righthaven holds the exclusive right to distribute copies of the Work, pursuant to
17 U.S.C. § 106(3).
39.
Righthaven holds the exclusive right to publicly display the Work, pursuant to 17
U.S.C. § 106(5).
40.
The Defendants reproduced the Work in derogation of Righthaven’s exclusive
rights under 17 U.S.C. § 106(1).
41.
The Defendants created an unauthorized derivative of the Work in derogation of
Righthaven’s exclusive rights under 17 U.S.C. § 106(2).
42.
The Defendants distributed, and continue to distribute, an unauthorized
reproduction of the Work on the Website, in derogation of Righthaven’s exclusive rights under
17 U.S.C. § 106(3).
43.
The Defendants publicly displayed, and continue to publicly display, an
unauthorized reproduction of the Work on the Website, in derogation of Righthaven’s exclusive
rights under 17 U.S.C. § 106(5).
44.
The Defendants have willfully engaged in the copyright infringement of the
45.
The Defendants’ acts as alleged herein, and the ongoing direct results of those
Work.
acts, have caused and will continue to cause irreparable harm to Righthaven in an amount
Righthaven cannot ascertain, leaving Righthaven with no adequate remedy at law.
46.
Unless the Defendants are preliminarily and permanently enjoined from further
infringement of the Work, Righthaven will be irreparably harmed, and Righthaven is thus
entitled to preliminary and permanent injunctive relief against further infringement by the
Defendants of the Work, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 502.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
Righthaven requests that this Court grant Righthaven’s claim for relief herein as follows:
1.
Preliminarily and permanently enjoin and restrain the Defendants, and the
Defendants’ officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, related companies, partners, and all
persons acting for, by, with, through, or under the Defendants, from directly or indirectly
infringing the Work by reproducing the Work, preparing derivative works based on the Work,
distributing the Work to the public, and/or displaying the Work, or ordering, directing,
participating in, or assisting in any such activity;
2.
Direct the Defendants to preserve, retain, and deliver to Righthaven in hard copies
or electronic copies:
a.
All evidence and documentation relating in any way to the Defendants’
use of the Work, in any form, including, without limitation, all such evidence and
documentation relating to the Website;
b.
All evidence and documentation relating to the names and addresses
(whether electronic mail addresses or otherwise) of any person with whom the
Defendants have communicated regarding the Defendants’ use of the Work; and
c.
All financial evidence and documentation relating to the Defendants’ use
of the Work;
3.
Direct GoDaddy, the current registrar, and any successor domain name registrar
for the Domain, to lock the Domain and transfer control of the Domain to Righthaven;
4.
Award Righthaven statutory damages for the willful infringement of the Work,
pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504(c);
5.
Award Righthaven costs, disbursements, and attorneys’ fees incurred by
Righthaven in bringing this action, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 505;
6.
law; and
Award Righthaven pre- and post-judgment interest in accordance with applicable
7.
Grant Righthaven such other relief as this Court deems appropriate.
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
Righthaven requests a trial by jury pursuant to Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure.
Dated this 28th day of March, 2011.
By: /s/ Steven G. Ganim
STEVEN G. GANIM, ESQ.
Righthaven LLC
9960 West Cheyenne Avenue, Suite 210
Las Vegas, Nevada 89129-7701
Tel: (702) 527-5900
Fax: (702) 527-5909
sganim@righthaven.com
SHAWN A. MANGANO, ESQ.
SHAWN A. MANGANO, LTD.
9960 West Cheyenne Avenue, Suite 170
Las Vegas, Nevada 89129-7701
Tel: (702) 304-0432
Fax: (702) 922-3851
shawn@manganolaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff Righthaven LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?