Griffith v. State of Colorado et al

Filing 5

ORDER Drawing Case. This case shall be drawn to a presiding judge and, if applicable, to a magistrate judge, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 12/15/14. (nmarb, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/15/2014: # 1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (nmarb, ).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 14-cv-03377-GPG DARLENE GRIFFITH, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF COLORADO, RICK RAEMISCH, in his official capacity as executive director fo the Colorado Department of Corrections, and in his individual capacity, ROGER WERHOLTZ, in his official capacity as executive director of the Department of Corrections and in his individual capacity, TONY CAROCHI, in his official capacity as executive director of the Department of Corrections and in his individual capacity, TOM CLEMENTS, in his official capacity as executive director of the Department of Corrections, and in his individual capacity, by and through his estate, ARISTEDES ZAVARIS, in his official capacity as executive director of the Department of Corrections, and in his individual capacity, JOE ORTIZ, in his official capacity as executive director of the Department of Corrections, and in his individual capacity, and JOHN SUTHERS, in his official capacity as executive director of the Department of Corrections and in his individual capacity, Defendants. ORDER DRAWING CASE After review pursuant to D.C.COLO.CivR 8.1(b), the Court has determined that this case does not appear to be appropriate f or summary dismissal and should be drawn to a presiding judge and, if applicable, to a magistrate judge, D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(a). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this case shall be drawn to a presiding judge and, if applicable, to a magistrate judge. DATED December 15, 2014, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: S/ Gordon P. Gallagher GORDON P. GALLAGHER United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?