Kleiman v. Colvin

Filing 14

ORDER re: 13 Joint Case Management Plan. The parties have indicated their intent under D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2(d) to consent to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that by September 21, 2015, the parties may sign and file the attached form of consent., by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 8/20/2015. (Attachments: # 1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (evana, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior Judge Wiley Y. Daniel Civil Action No. 15-cv-00399-WYD ANDREW J. KLEIMAN, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ORDER Daniel, J. This matter is before the court sua sponte. The parties have indicated their intent under D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2(d) to consent to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). (See Joint Case Management Plan ¶ 10 [#13], filed August 20, 2015.) To effectuate that consent, the parties must file the form required under Rule 72.2(d), entitled “Consent to the Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge,” a copy of which is attached to this Order.1 If the parties persist under Rule 72.2(d) in their consent to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), they should complete and file the consent form attached to this Order. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that by September 21, 2015, the parties may sign and file the attached form of consent. 1 A paradigm of this form also is available on the court’s website under “Rules & Procedures” at “Forms” and then under “Local Rules of Practice Forms.” Dated: August 20, 2015 BY THE COURT: /s/ Wiley Y. Daniel WILEY Y. DANIEL, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?