Kleiman v. Colvin
Filing
14
ORDER re: 13 Joint Case Management Plan. The parties have indicated their intent under D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2(d) to consent to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that by September 21, 2015, the parties may sign and file the attached form of consent., by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 8/20/2015. (Attachments: # 1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (evana, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior Judge Wiley Y. Daniel
Civil Action No. 15-cv-00399-WYD
ANDREW J. KLEIMAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
ORDER
Daniel, J.
This matter is before the court sua sponte. The parties have indicated their intent under
D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2(d) to consent to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. §
636(c). (See Joint Case Management Plan ¶ 10 [#13], filed August 20, 2015.) To effectuate
that consent, the parties must file the form required under Rule 72.2(d), entitled “Consent to the
Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge,” a copy of which is attached to
this Order.1 If the parties persist under Rule 72.2(d) in their consent to the jurisdiction of a
magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), they should complete and file the consent form
attached to this Order.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that by September 21, 2015, the parties may sign and
file the attached form of consent.
1
A paradigm of this form also is available on the court’s website under “Rules & Procedures” at
“Forms” and then under “Local Rules of Practice Forms.”
Dated: August 20, 2015
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Wiley Y. Daniel
WILEY Y. DANIEL,
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?