Howard v. Colvin
Filing
19
ORDER That by September 23, 2015, the parties may sign and file the attached form of consent. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 9/9/2015. (Attachments: # 1 Standard 72.2 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (mlace, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 15-cv-00472-REB
JAHLIL J. HOWARD,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
ORDER
Blackburn, J.
This matter is before the court sua sponte. The parties have indicated their intent
under D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2(d) to consent to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge
under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). (See Joint Case Management Plan ¶ 10 [#18], filed August
27, 2015.) To effectuate that consent, the parties must file the form required under Rule
72.2(d), entitled “Consent to the Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate
Judge,” a copy of which is attached to this Order.1 If the parties persist under Rule
72.2(d) in their consent to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. §
636(c), they should complete and file the consent form attached to this Order.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That by September 23, 2015, the parties may sign and file the attached form
of consent; and
1
A paradigm of this form also is available on the court’s website under “Rules & Procedures” at
“Forms” and then under “Local Rules of Practice Forms.”
2. That on completion of pre-merits management, the court shall issue an
appropriate order of reference directing the clerk of the court to assign this matter to a
United States Magistrate Judge.
Dated September 9, 2015, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?