Vigil v. Social Security Administration
ORDER Consent Form due by 11/30/2015, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 10/26/2015. (Attachments: # 1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (evana, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior Judge Wiley Y. Daniel
Civil Action No. 15-cv-00829-WYD
EDDIE MOSES VIGIL, III,
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
This matter is before the court sua sponte. The parties have indicated their intent under
D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2(d) to consent to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. §
636(c). (See Joint Case Management Plan ¶ 10 [#20], filed October 26, 2015.) To effectuate
that consent, the parties must file the form required under Rule 72.2(d), entitled “Consent to the
Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge,” a copy of which is attached to
this Order.1 If the parties persist under Rule 72.2(d) in their consent to the jurisdiction of a
magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), they should complete and file the consent form
attached to this Order.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that by November 30, 2015, the parties may sign and
file the attached form of consent.
A paradigm of this form also is available on the court’s website under “Rules & Procedures” at
“Forms” and then under “Local Rules of Practice Forms.”
Dated: October 26, 2015
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Wiley Y. Daniel
WILEY Y. DANIEL,
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No.:________________________
CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION
BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2, you are hereby notified that a United
States magistrate judge of this district court is available to handle all dispositive matters in this civil action, including a jury or nonjury trial, and to order
the entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by a magistrate judge, however, is permitted only if all parties voluntarily consent and the district
judge orders the reference to a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
You may, without adverse substantive consequences, withhold your consent, but this will prevent the court's jurisdiction from being
exercised by a magistrate judge. If any party withholds consent, the identity of the parties consenting or withholding consent will not be
communicated to any magistrate judge or to the district judge to whom the case has been assigned.
Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2, no district judge or magistrate judge, court official, or court employee may attempt to influence the
granting or withholding of consent to the reference of any civil matter to a magistrate judge under this rule.
An appeal from a judgment entered by a magistrate judge shall be taken directly to the appropriate United States Court of Appeals in the
same manner as an appeal from any other judgment of a district court.
If this civil action has been referred to a magistrate judge to handle certain nondispositive matters, that reference shall remain in effect.
Upon entry of an order of reference pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the civil action will be assigned to the magistrate judge then assigned to the
CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2, the parties in this civil action
hereby voluntarily consent to have a United States magistrate judge conduct any and all further proceedings in the case, including the trial, and order
the entry of a final judgment.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?