Doe 1 et al v. Ciolli et al

Filing 38

Docket Entry Correction: Documents 19 Amended Complaint; 21 MOTION to Expedite Discovery; (Attachments: # 1 Motion to Expedited Discovery, # 2 Memorandum in Support of Motion to Expedited Discovery, # 3 Affidavit Declaration of Doe I, # 4 Affidavit Declaration of Doe II, # 5 Affidavit Declaration of Doe II (Part 2 of 2), # 6 Affidavit Declaration of Steve Mitra (Part 1 of 2), # 7 Affidavit Declaration of Steve Mitra (Part 2 of 2), # 8 Proposed Order, # 9 Motion to Substitute She1 lhammer, # 10 Exhibit 1); 26 MOTION to Substitute Party Name

Doe 1 et al v. Ciolli et al

Doc. 38 Att. 5

Dockets.Justia.com

AutoAdmit.com - Notice to YLS . lty concerning (DOE II)

Page 3 of 23

Date: March 9th, 2007 2:03 PM Author: lonelyvirgin
This e-mail wil be dispatched to the entire YLS faculty within the next five minutes. I've assembled a spreadsheet with their addresses and every single one of them wil be notified about what our darling little

lDOE II) has done. I post this here as a warning to all those who would try to regulate the more antisocial posters- we have the power now.

Dear Yale Law faculty,
I write to you now about a very important issue that affects a non-trivial number of

you. Although you undoubtedly deal with self-entitled, spoiled students on a regular basis, there's one person in particular
whose history I feel you must be made aware of before problems arise. lDOE III , a student in your 09

class, has a felon as a father who stole money from the World Bank to buy her horses. I kid you not, she asked her father for horses so he took money from an organization aimed at helping the poor. Just imagine how hard she must have begged him in order to commit such an odious crime. One could make the argument that her character at ten is not representative of her values as an adult, if it wasn't for the recent evidence to the contrary. She spent in excess of $150 to remove material that was in the public domain, simply because she found it offensive that it emphasized her good looks. If such reckless use of money in the name of free speech suppression is not indicative of a damaged character, I don't know what it is. Best of luck to you in managing this liability, it is regretful that the admissions process can't encapsulate the entire person.
XOXO
HTH

Patrick Bateman (Harvard Law School 08)
References:
hHp)Jwww .1lnç.~du/new.sÚi..rçhiY_~s/ apr04h.ld.iU0426Jl"i.html

http://WWw.highbtam.cümldQç/1Pf.::9...tS2t51.html

111tpjlabcnews ,go. cürnUS/print?id""i2123 64

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread. php ?thread _ id= 5 9 2 608&forum _ id= 2#772 9 5 92)

-fi T opfi Previous" ~J e~:t v; R epl!l

Date: March 9th, 2007 2:07 PM

Author: .......43.r543.3.
Your moniker makes sense.
(http://www:autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread _ id=592608&forum _id=2#7729612)

http://notice-to-yls-faculty-concer -

¡DOE II)

autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread _id=592608&mc... 6/12/2007