Market America Inc. v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 11

MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Amy B. Ginensky - filed by Google Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Certification)(Panichelli, Maria)

Download PDF
Market America Inc. v. Google Inc. et al Doc. 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE MARKET AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, vs. GOOGLE INC. and LTECH CONSULTING, LLC, Defendants. ) ) ) Civil Action No. 1:09-cv-00494-GMS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MOTION AND ORDER FOR ADMISSION OF AMY B. GINENSKY PRO HAC VICE Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 and the attached certification, counsel moves the admission pro hac vice of Amy B. Ginensky, Esquire, to represent defendant Google Inc. in this matter. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Maria L. Panichelli M. Duncan Grant (Del. Bar No. 2994) Maria L. Panichelli (Del. Bar No. 5047) PEPPER HAMILTON LLP Hercules Plaza, Suite 5100 1313 N. Market Street, P.O. Box 1709 Wilmington, DE 19899-1709 Tel: (302) 777-6500 Fax: (302) 421-8390 panichellim@pepperlaw.com Dated: August 12, 2009 Attorneys for Defendant Google Inc. ORDER GRANTING MOTION IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that counsel's motion for the admission of Amy B. Ginensky pro hac vice is granted. Dated: ____________, 2009 United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on August 12, 2009, the foregoing Motion and Order for Admission of Amy B. Ginensky Pro Hac Vice was filed with the Clerk of Court using CM/ECF, which will send notification of such filing to the following counsel of record: Matthew F. Lintner Morris James LLP 500 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1500 Wilmington, DE 19801 Attorney for Plaintiff Market America, Inc. I further certify that the Motion and Order for Admission of Amy B. Ginensky Pro Hac Vice was also served on the following unrepresented party via First Class Mail: LTech Consulting, LLC 400 Somerset Corporate Blvd Suite 500 Bridgewater, NJ 08807 /s/ Maria L. Panichelli Maria L. Panichelli (#5047) #11269977 v1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?