Personalized User Model LLP v. Google Inc.

Filing 503

NOTICE of Local Rule 7.1.2(b) Notice of Supplemental Authority for Defendant Google Inc.'s Summary Judgment Briefs by Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Moore, David)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE PERSONALIZED USER MODEL, L.L.P., Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C.A. No. 09-525-LPS JURY TRIAL DEMANDED LOCAL RULE 7.1.2(b) NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY FOR DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.’S SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFS On February 14, 2012, after summary judgment briefing was complete, the PTO’s Central Re-Examination Unit issued a Final Office Action and Right to Appeal Notice (RAN) in the ongoing re-examination of U.S. Patent No. 6,981, 040 (“the '040 patent”), one of the two asserted patents in this case. The RAN is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. See Local Rule 7.1.2(b) (permitting citation to subsequent authorities after submission of reply briefs). This RAN maintained every existing rejection of every asserted ‘040 claim. Every asserted claim still stands as rejected on four independent grounds, in light of four primary prior art references, including the Refuah, Mladenic, and Wasfi references cited in the parties’ summary judgment papers. With the issuance of this RAN, every asserted claim from both asserted patents now stands as finally rejected by the Central ReExamination Unit, subject to Plaintiff PUM’s appeal to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Certain of the findings in the RAN also contradict arguments made by PUM in opposing Defendants’ summary judgment motions. Specifically, PUM argues that Refuah does not disclose a learning machine (D.I. 455 at 3-5), does not analyze a “document” because it only analyzes websites (id. at 6), and does not estimate a “probability” of document interestingness (id. at 5-6). Yet the RAN found, as Google has shown, that Refuah does disclose a learning machine and parameters thereof (RAN at 23), that Refuah’s analysis of websites qualifies as analyzing a “document” (id. at 24), and that Refuah’s grade of how well a site matches a user’s personality qualifies as a “probability” under PUM’s interpretation of this term from this litigation. (Id. at 22-23.) Further, contrary to PUM’s infringement argument that the claimed “probability” can be any number and need not be between 0 and 1 (D.I. 460 at 9), the RAN found that a “probability” does require a number between 0 and 1. (RAN at 32.) POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP OF COUNSEL: Charles K. Verhoeven David A. Perlson Joshua Lee Sohn Antonio R. Sistos Margaret Pirnir Kammerud QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 50 California St. San Francisco, CA 94111 Tel.: (415) 875-6600 Andrea Pallios Roberts QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Tel.: (650) 801-5000 Dated: February 19, 2013 1095096 / 34638 By: /s/ David E. Moore Richard L. Horwitz (#2246) David E. Moore (#3983) Bindu A. Palapura (#5370) Hercules Plaza, 6th Floor 1313 N. Market Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Tel: (302) 984-6000 rhorwitz@potteranderson.com dmoore@potteranderson.com bpalapura@potteranderson.com Attorneys for Defendant Google Inc. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, David E. Moore, hereby certify that on February 19, 2013, the attached document was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF which will send notification to the registered attorney(s) of record that the document has been filed and is available for viewing and downloading. I further certify that on February 19, 2013, the attached document was Electronically Mailed to the following person(s): Karen Jacobs Louden Jeremy A. Tigan Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP 1201 North Market Street, 18th Fl. Wilmington, DE 19899-1347 klouden@mnat.com jtigan@mnat.com Marc S. Friedman SNR Denton US LLP 1221 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10020-1089 marc.friedman@snrdenton.com Jennifer D. Bennett Matthew P. Larson SNR Denton US LLP 1530 Page Mill Road, Ste. 200 Palo Alto, CA 94304-1125 jennifer.bennett@snrdenton.com matthew.larson@snrdenton.com Mark C. Nelson Robert Needham SNR Denton US LLP 2000 McKinney, Suite 1900 Dallas, TX 75201 mark.nelson@snrdenton.com robert.needham@snrdenton.com Christian E. Samay SNR Denton US LLP 101 JFK Parkway Short Hills, NJ 07078 christian.samay@snrdenton.com /s/ David E. Moore Richard L. Horwitz David E. Moore Bindu A. Palapura POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP (302) 984-6000 rhorwitz@potteranderson.com dmoore@potteranderson.com bpalapura@potteranderson.com 932168 / 34638

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?