Personalized User Model LLP v. Google Inc.

Filing 555

MOTION TO EXCLUDE PORTIONS OF DR. EDWARD FOX'S NON-INFRINGEMENT REPORT FOR FAILURE TO APPLY THE COURT'S CLAIM CONSTRUCTION - filed by Personalized User Model LLP. (Attachments: # 1 7.1.1, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Tigan, Jeremy)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE PERSONALIZED USER MODEL, L.L.P., ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) GOOGLE, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ______________________________________ ) GOOGLE, INC., ) ) Counterclaimant, ) ) v. ) ) PERSONALIZED USER MODEL, L.L.P. ) and YOCHAI KONIG, ) ) Counterclaim-Defendants. ) C.A. No. 09-525 (LPS) ORDER Having considered Plaintiff Personalized User Model, L.L.P.’s Daubert Motion to Exclude Portions of Dr. Edward Fox’s Non-Infringement Report For Failure to Apply The Court’s Claim Construction, it is HEREBY ORDERED THAT: (1) The Motion is GRANTED; and (2) The following opinions of Dr. Fox are excluded:  “User Model specific to the user” and “user-specific learning machine” (including at least Dr. Fox's opinions and arguments each user have his/her own user model/learning machine exclusive to the user).  “estimating” (including at least Dr. Fox's opinions and arguments that estimating cannot include a calculation or computation).  “probability” (including at least Dr. Fox's opinions that a “probability” must be between 0 and 1 or an equivalent number such as a percent between 0% and 100%). SO ORDERED this ___ day of _________, 2014. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?