Personalized User Model LLP v. Google Inc.

Filing 643

Letter to the Honorable Leonard P. Stark from Richard L. Horwitz regarding response to PUM letter dated March 11, 2014 - re 640 Letter,. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Horwitz, Richard)

Download PDF
1313 North Market Street P.O. Box 951 Wilmington, DE 19899-0951 302 984 6000 Richard L. Horwitz Partner Attorney at Law 302 984-6027 Direct Phone 302 658-1192 Fax March 11, 2014 The Honorable Leonard P. Stark United States District Court for the District of Delaware 844 North King Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Re: VIA ELECTRONIC FILING Personalized User Model, L.L.P. v. Google, Inc. C.A. No. 09-525 (LPS) Dear Judge Stark: Earlier today, PUM filed a letter with the Court (D.I. 640) which included a chart purportedly listing which claims Google contends are anticipated by which prior art references. PUM said that this chart represents "Google's final list of anticipatory references" that "Google provided on March 5, 2014." (Id. at 1.) What Google provided to PUM on March 5, 2014 is an emailed list of which references Google will assert for anticipation and which references Google will assert for obviousness. Google's March 5 email to PUM is attached hereto as Exhibit A. As shown in that email, Google stated that it will assert the Mladenic, Wasfi, and Montebello references for anticipation and obviousness, while it will assert the Refuah and Joachims references for obviousness only. Respectfully, /s/ Richard L. Horwitz Richard L. Horwitz cc: Clerk of the Court (by hand) All Counsel of Record (by e-mail)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?