Personalized User Model LLP v. Google Inc.
Filing
643
Letter to the Honorable Leonard P. Stark from Richard L. Horwitz regarding response to PUM letter dated March 11, 2014 - re 640 Letter,. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Horwitz, Richard)
1313 North Market Street
P.O. Box 951
Wilmington, DE 19899-0951
302 984 6000
www.potteranderson.com
Richard L. Horwitz
Partner
Attorney at Law
rhorwitz@potteranderson.com
302 984-6027 Direct Phone
302 658-1192 Fax
March 11, 2014
The Honorable Leonard P. Stark
United States District Court
for the District of Delaware
844 North King Street
Wilmington, DE 19801
Re:
VIA ELECTRONIC FILING
Personalized User Model, L.L.P. v. Google, Inc.
C.A. No. 09-525 (LPS)
Dear Judge Stark:
Earlier today, PUM filed a letter with the Court (D.I. 640) which included a chart
purportedly listing which claims Google contends are anticipated by which prior art references.
PUM said that this chart represents "Google's final list of anticipatory references" that "Google
provided on March 5, 2014." (Id. at 1.)
What Google provided to PUM on March 5, 2014 is an emailed list of which references
Google will assert for anticipation and which references Google will assert for obviousness.
Google's March 5 email to PUM is attached hereto as Exhibit A. As shown in that email, Google
stated that it will assert the Mladenic, Wasfi, and Montebello references for anticipation and
obviousness, while it will assert the Refuah and Joachims references for obviousness only.
Respectfully,
/s/ Richard L. Horwitz
Richard L. Horwitz
cc:
Clerk of the Court (by hand)
All Counsel of Record (by e-mail)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?