Personalized User Model LLP v. Google Inc.

Filing 654

VERDICT SHEET by Personalized User Model LLP [Personalized User Model's Second Corrected Proposed Verdict Form]. (Attachments: # 1 Letter)(Tigan, Jeremy)

Download PDF
MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP 1201 N ORTH M ARKE T S T RE E T P.O. B OX 1347 W ILMINGT ON , D E LAW ARE 19899-1347 (302) 658-9200 (302) 658-3989 FAX JEREMY A. TIGAN (302) 351-9106 March 16, 2014 The Honorable Leonard P. Stark United States District Court for the District of Delaware 844 North King Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Re: VIA ELECTRONIC FILING Personalized User Model, L.L.P. v. Google, Inc. C.A. No. 09-525 (LPS) Dear Judge Stark: Enclosed is a further corrected version of PUM’s Proposed Verdict Form, updated to correct an error in the claims that are asserted against certain products (claim 21 of the ’276 patent is asserted against Search Ads, but not Content Ads and YouTube) and to reflect the scope of Google’s invalidity case as presented at trial. Respectfully, /s/ Jeremy A. Tigan Jeremy A. Tigan (#5239) JAT/lm cc: Clerk of the Court (by hand) All Counsel of Record (by e-mail) 8093015.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?