Personalized User Model LLP v. Google Inc.

Filing 654

VERDICT SHEET by Personalized User Model LLP [Personalized User Model's Second Corrected Proposed Verdict Form]. (Attachments: # 1 Letter)(Tigan, Jeremy)

MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT

&

TUNNELL

LLP

1201 N ORTH M ARKE T S T RE E T
P.O. B OX 1347
W ILMINGT ON , D E LAW ARE 19899-1347
[phone]
[phone] FAX
JEREMY A. TIGAN
[phone]
[e-mail]

March 16, 2014

The Honorable Leonard P. Stark
United States District Court
for the District of Delaware
844 North King Street
Wilmington, DE 19801
Re:

VIA ELECTRONIC FILING

Personalized User Model, L.L.P. v. Google, Inc.
C.A. No. 09-525 (LPS)

Dear Judge Stark:
Enclosed is a further corrected version of PUM’s Proposed Verdict Form, updated to
correct an error in the claims that are asserted against certain products (claim 21 of the ’276
patent is asserted against Search Ads, but not Content Ads and YouTube) and to reflect the scope
of Google’s invalidity case as presented at trial.
Respectfully,

/s/ Jeremy A. Tigan
Jeremy A. Tigan (#5239)
JAT/lm
cc:
Clerk of the Court (by hand)
All Counsel of Record (by e-mail)
8093015.1