Personalized User Model LLP v. Google Inc.
Filing
654
VERDICT SHEET by Personalized User Model LLP [Personalized User Model's Second Corrected Proposed Verdict Form]. (Attachments: # 1 Letter)(Tigan, Jeremy)
MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT
&
TUNNELL
LLP
1201 N ORTH M ARKE T S T RE E T
P.O. B OX 1347
W ILMINGT ON , D E LAW ARE 19899-1347
(302) 658-9200
(302) 658-3989 FAX
JEREMY A. TIGAN
(302) 351-9106
jtigan@mnat.com
March 16, 2014
The Honorable Leonard P. Stark
United States District Court
for the District of Delaware
844 North King Street
Wilmington, DE 19801
Re:
VIA ELECTRONIC FILING
Personalized User Model, L.L.P. v. Google, Inc.
C.A. No. 09-525 (LPS)
Dear Judge Stark:
Enclosed is a further corrected version of PUM’s Proposed Verdict Form, updated to
correct an error in the claims that are asserted against certain products (claim 21 of the ’276
patent is asserted against Search Ads, but not Content Ads and YouTube) and to reflect the scope
of Google’s invalidity case as presented at trial.
Respectfully,
/s/ Jeremy A. Tigan
Jeremy A. Tigan (#5239)
JAT/lm
cc:
Clerk of the Court (by hand)
All Counsel of Record (by e-mail)
8093015.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?