Personalized User Model LLP v. Google Inc.

Filing 94

PROPOSED ORDER Amended Scheduling Order re 32 Scheduling Order, Stipulated Amended Scheduling Order by Google Inc., Personalized User Model LLP. (Attachments: # 1 Letter)(Tigan, Jeremy)

Personalized User Model LLP v. Google Inc.

Doc. 94 Att. 1

MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL
1 2 0 1 N O R T H MARKET STREET P.O. BOX 1347 W I L M I N G T O N , D E L A W A R E 19899-1347 (302 ) 658- 9200 (302 ) 658- 3989 F A X
JEREMY A. TIGAN [phone] [phone] FAX [e-mail]

LLP

September 15, 2010 BY ELECTRONIC FILING The Honorable Leonard P. Stark United States District Court for the District of Delaware 844 North King Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Re: Dear Judge Stark: On behalf of both parties, enclosed please find a Stipulated Amended Scheduling Order for the Court's consideration. Pursuant to Your Honor's direction during the telephonic hearing held on September 8, the parties have agreed to amend certain dates in the Scheduling Order (D.I. 32) related to claim construction and discovery. In paragraph seven of the stipulation, the parties propose that the Court schedule a Markman hearing for a date in January 2011. Because counsel for Google are scheduled to be in trial and in pre-trial preparations and conferences in another case during the last two weeks of January, however, the parties respectfully request a hearing date during the first two weeks of January. In addition, although the parties have left the number of trial days blank, they jointly request that the Court set this case for a ten-day trial. Respect fully, Personalized User Model, L.L.P. v. Google, Inc. C.A. No. 09-525 (LPS)

/s/ Jeremy A. Tigan
Jeremy A. Tigan (#5239) JAT/lh Enclosure cc: Clerk of the Court (Via Hand Delivery) Counsel of Record (Via ECF)
3774059

Dockets.Justia.com