Apple Inc. v. High Tech Computer Corp. et al

Filing 24

MOTION for Extension of Time to File 1) Reply Brief in Support of Defendants' Motion to Transfer Venue [D.I. 8 in C.A. No. 10-166-RK and D.I. 8 in C.A. No. 10-167-RK] and 2) Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Consolidation [D.I. 21 in C.A. No. 10-166-RK and D.I. 19 in C.A. No. 10-167-RK] - UNOPPOSED - filed by Exedea Inc., HTC (BVI) Corp., HTC America Inc., High Tech Computer Corp.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Pascale, Karen)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE _____________________________________ APPLE INC., and NeXT SOFTWARE, INC.,) f/k/a NeXT COMPUTER, INC., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) ) HIGH TECH COMPUTER CORP., a/k/a ) HTC CORP., HTC (B.V.I.) CORP., HTC ) AMERICA, INC., and EXEDEA, INC., ) ) Defendants. ) _____________________________________ APPLE INC., Plaintiff, v. HIGH TECH COMPUTER CORP., a/k/a HTC CORP., HTC (B.V.I.) CORP., HTC AMERICA, INC., and EXEDEA, INC., Defendants. _____________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C.A. No. 10-166-RK C.A. No. 10-167-RK ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Upon consideration of Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time filed herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this ___ day of, June, 2010 that said Unopposed Motion is GRANTED. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE YCST01:9733132.1 069415.1001

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?