Walker Digital LLC v. American Airlines, Inc. et al
Filing
1
COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Amazon.Com Inc., American Airlines, Inc., BBY Solutions Inc., Best Buy Co. Inc., BestBuy.com LLC, Dell Inc., Delta Air Lines Inc., Expedia Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Sony Electronics Inc, Wall-Mart Stores Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 0311-873780.) - filed by Walker Digital LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Civil Cover Sheet)(els)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
WALKER DIGITAL, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
Civil Action No. ___________
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.;
AMAZON.COM, INC.; BEST BUY CO.,
INC.; BESTBUY.COM, LLC; BBY
SOLUTIONS, INC.; DELL INC.; DELTA
AIR LINES, INC.; EXPEDIA, INC.;
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY; SONY
ELECTRONICS INC.; AND WAL-MART
STORES, INC.,
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
Defendants.
COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
Plaintiff Walker Digital, LLC (“Walker Digital”) files this complaint for patent
infringement against defendants Amazon.com, Inc. (“Amazon”), American Airlines, Inc.
(“American”), Best Buy Co., Inc. (“Best Buy Co.”), BestBuy.com, LLC (“BestBuy.com”), BBY
Solutions, Inc. (“BBY”), Dell Inc. (“Dell”), Delta Air Lines, Inc. (“Delta”), Expedia, Inc.
(“Expedia”), Hewlett-Packard Company (“HP”), Sony Electronics Inc. (“Sony”), and Wal-Mart
Stores, Inc. (Wal-Mart”) (collectively, the “Defendants”):
THE PARTIES
1.
Walker Digital is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of
business located at 2 High Ridge Park, Stamford, Connecticut 06905. Walker Digital is a worldrenowned research and development laboratory responsible for launching several successful
businesses, including Priceline.com and Synapse, Inc.
2.
On information and belief, Amazon is a Delaware corporation with its principal
place of business located at 410 Terry Ave North, Seattle, Washington 98109-5210.
3.
On information and belief, American is a Delaware corporation with its principal
place of business located at 4333 Amon Carter Boulevard, Fort Worth, Texas 76155.
4.
On information and belief, Best Buy Co. is a Minnesota corporation with its
principal place of business located at 7601 Penn Avenue South, Richfield, Minnesota 55423.
5.
On information and belief, BestBuy.com is a Virginia limited liability company
with its principal place of business located at 7075 Flying Cloud Drive, Eden Prairie, Minnesota
55344-3532.
6.
On information and belief, BBY is a Minnesota corporation with its principal
place of business located at 100 S 5th Street, Suite 1075, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402.
7.
On information and belief, Dell is a Delaware corporation with its principal place
of business located at 1 Dell Way, Round Rock, Texas 78682.
8.
On information and belief, Delta is a Delaware corporation with its principal
place of business located at 1030 Delta Boulevard, Atlanta, Georgia 30320-6001.
9.
On information and belief, Expedia is a Delaware corporation with its principal
place of business located at 333 108th Avenue Northeast, Bellevue, Washington 98004.
10.
On information and belief, HP is a Delaware corporation with its principal place
of business located at 3000 Hanover Street, Palo Alto, California 94304.
-2-
11.
On information and belief, Sony is a Delaware corporation with its principal place
of business located at 16530 Via Esprillo, San Diego, California 92127.
12.
On information and belief, Wal-Mart is a Delaware corporation with its principal
place of business located at 702 Southwest 8th Street, Bentonville, Arkansas 72716.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
13.
This action arises under the patent laws of the United States, Title 35 of the
United States Code. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and
1338(a).
14.
On information and belief, each Defendant is subject to this Court’s jurisdiction
because each Defendant has transacted business in this district, including, more specifically,
directly and/or through intermediaries, making, using, importing, offering for sale and/or selling
products and services in the State of Delaware (including via the provision of such goods and
services over the Internet). Each defendant, upon information and belief, is doing substantial
business in this District, and has committed acts of patent infringement in this District. In
addition, each Defendant except for Best Buy Co., BestBuy.com, and BBY is a corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware.
15.
Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b) and (c), and 1400(b).
THE ASSERTED PATENTS
16.
On October 24, 2000, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”)
duly and legally issued U.S. Patent No. 6,138,105 (the “’105 patent”), entitled “System and
Method for Dynamic Assembly of Packages in Retail Environments,” to Jay S. Walker, Daniel
E. Tedesco, and Andrew S. Van Luchene, who assigned their rights and interests in the ’105
patent to Walker Digital. A true and correct copy of the ’105 patent is attached as Exhibit A.
-3-
17.
On July 29, 2003, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”)
duly and legally issued U.S. Patent No. 6,601,036 (the “’036 patent”), entitled “System and
Method for Dynamic Assembly of Packages in Retail Environments,” to Jay S. Walker, Daniel
E. Tedesco, and Andrew S. Van Luchene, who assigned their rights and interests in the ’036
patent to Walker Digital. A true and correct copy of the ’036 patent is attached as Exhibit B.
18.
Walker Digital is the owner of the ’105 and ’036 patents (collectively, the
“Asserted Patents”).
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
19.
Walker Digital is a research and development laboratory that has invested many
millions of dollars in its intellectual property. Walker Digital is comprised of a diverse group of
inventors who solve business problems by analyzing human behavior and designing innovative
solutions incorporating modern information technologies. The novel inventions developed by
the Walker Digital team are reflected in a portfolio of more than 200 U.S. and international
patents in a wide range of industries that includes retail, vending, credit cards, security, gaming,
educational testing, and entertainment.
20.
Jay S. Walker, the chairman of Walker Digital, is a named inventor of more than
450 issued and pending U.S. and international patents, including each of the Asserted Patents.
Mr. Walker is best known as the founder of Priceline.com, which revolutionized the travel
industry through unprecedented technology, with the end result of bringing huge savings in
airfare, hotel and car rental rates, and other travel related goods and services to every-day
consumers. The systems at the heart of Priceline.com’s success were developed in the research
and development laboratory of Walker Digital.
21.
Development of the inventions conceived by Mr. Walker and the Walker Digital
team of inventors would not have been possible without substantial financial investments made
-4-
by Walker Digital. Funds invested by Walker Digital have been used for many things, including
the construction of laboratory facilities utilized to develop and test new inventions. Many of the
inventions developed at the Walker Digital laboratories have led to successful businesses,
including Priceline.com and Synapse, Inc. Revolutionary technologies, including the systems
and methods for generating a single-use financial account number for facilitating financial
account transactions, as described and claimed in the Asserted Patents, were a direct result of
investments made by Walker Digital.
22.
The Asserted Patents represent breakthroughs in the field of retail sales of
products and services.
COUNT I
(Infringement of the ’105 Patent)
23.
Walker Digital incorporates and realleges the allegations of paragraphs 1-22 as
are fully set forth above.
24.
Upon information and belief, Amazon is infringing (literally and/or under the
doctrine of equivalents) the ’105 patent in this District and throughout the United States by,
among other things, making, using, importing, offering for sale and/or selling products and
services, including at least its Frequently Bought Together feature, which practice one or more of
the claims of the ’105 patent. For instance, upon information and belief, Amazon’s Frequently
Bought Together feature offers products together as a package but no longer offers the package
when the inventory level of one of the products reaches 0.
25.
Upon information and belief, American is infringing (literally and/or under the
doctrine of equivalents) the ’105 patent in this District and throughout the United States by,
among other things, making, using, importing, offering for sale and/or selling products and
services, including at least its sales of airline ticket on its website with hotel packages, which
-5-
practice one or more of the claims of the ’105 patent. For instance, upon information and belief,
American offers hotel packages on its web site with the purchase of airline tickets but no longer
offers the package when the inventory level of one of the products reaches 0.
26.
Upon information and belief, each of Best Buy Co., BestBuy.com, and BBY is
infringing (literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents) the ’105 patent in this District and
throughout the United States by, among other things, making, using, importing, offering for sale
and/or selling products and services, including at least their Related Products offering feature,
which practice one or more of the claims of the ’105 patent. For instance, upon information and
belief, their Related Products feature offers products together as a package but no longer offers
the package when the inventory level of one of the products reaches 0.
27.
Upon information and belief, Dell is infringing (literally and/or under the doctrine
of equivalents) the ’105 patent in this District and throughout the United States by, among other
things, making, using, importing, offering for sale and/or selling products and services, including
at least its Related Products and Required Products offering features, which practice one or more
of the claims of the ’105 patent. For instance, upon information and belief, Dell’s Related
Products and Required Products features offer products together as a package but no longer offer
the package when the inventory level of one of the products reaches 0.
28.
Upon information and belief, Delta is infringing (literally and/or under the
doctrine of equivalents) the ’105 patent in this District and throughout the United States by,
among other things, making, using, importing, offering for sale and/or selling products and
services, including at least its sales of airline ticket on its website with hotel and Trip Services &
Activities packages, which practice one or more of the claims of the ’105 patent. For instance,
upon information and belief, Delta offers hotel and other trip service and activity packages on its
-6-
web site with the purchase of airline tickets but no longer offers the package when the inventory
level of one of the products reaches 0.
29.
Upon information and belief, Expedia is infringing (literally and/or under the
doctrine of equivalents) the ’105 patent in this District and throughout the United States by,
among other things, making, using, importing, offering for sale and/or selling products and
services, including at least its sales of airline ticket on its website with hotel packages under a
"Save Even More – Add a Hotel" heading, which practice one or more of the claims of the ’105
patent. For instance, upon information and belief, Expedia offers hotel packages on its web site
with the purchase of airline tickets but no longer offers the package when the inventory level of
one of the products reaches 0.
30.
Upon information and belief, HP is infringing (literally and/or under the doctrine
of equivalents) the ’105 patent in this District and throughout the United States by, among other
things, making, using, importing, offering for sale and/or selling products and services, including
at least its offerings on its web site under the headings “Customers who bought also bought,”
“May we suggest” and “Consider these products,” which practice one or more of the claims of
the ’105 patent.
For instance, upon information and belief, those offerings offer products
together as a package but no longer offer the package when the inventory level of one of the
products reaches 0.
31.
Upon information and belief, Sony is infringing (literally and/or under the
doctrine of equivalents) the ’105 patent in this District and throughout the United States by,
among other things, making, using, importing, offering for sale and/or selling products and
services, including at least its offerings on its web site under the headings “Add Accessories” and
“Sony Recommends,” which practice one or more of the claims of the ’105 patent. For instance,
-7-
upon information and belief, those offerings offer products together as a package but no longer
offer the package when the inventory level of one of the products reaches 0.
32.
Upon information and belief, Wal-Mart is infringing (literally and/or under the
doctrine of equivalents) the ’105 patent in this District and throughout the United States by,
among other things, making, using, importing, offering for sale and/or selling products and
services, including at least its offering on its web site under the heading “People Who Bought
This Item Also Bought,” which practice one or more of the claims of the ’105 patent. For
instance, upon information and belief, this offering offers products together as a package but no
longer offers the package when the inventory level of one of the products reaches 0.
33.
Each defendant has committed these acts of infringement without license or
authorization.
34.
As a result of each defendant’s infringement of the ’105 patent, Walker Digital
has suffered monetary damages in an amount not yet determined, and will continue to suffer
damages in the future unless each defendant’s infringing activities are enjoined by this Court.
35.
Walker Digital has suffered and will continue to suffer severe and irreparable
harm unless this Court issues a permanent injunction prohibiting each defendant, its agents,
servants, employees, representatives, and all others acting in active concert therewith from
infringing the ’105 patent.
COUNT II
(Infringement of the ’036 Patent)
36.
Walker Digital incorporates and realleges the allegations of paragraphs 1-35 as
are fully set forth above.
37.
Upon information and belief, Amazon is infringing (literally and/or under the
doctrine of equivalents) the ’036 patent in this District and throughout the United States by,
-8-
among other things, making, using, importing, offering for sale and/or selling products and
services, including at least its Frequently Bought Together feature, which practice one or more of
the claims of the ’036 patent. For instance, upon information and belief, Amazon’s Frequently
Bought Together feature offers products together where at least one of the products is a
complementary product that has an acceptable demand level, such as number of complementary
products sold historically or daily or other such determinations.
38.
Upon information and belief, American is infringing (literally and/or under the
doctrine of equivalents) the ’036 patent in this District and throughout the United States by,
among other things, making, using, importing, offering for sale and/or selling products and
services, including at least its sales of airline ticket on its website with hotel packages, which
practice one or more of the claims of the ’036 patent. For instance, upon information and belief,
American offers hotel packages on its web site with the purchase of airline tickets where at least
one of the products is a complementary product that has an acceptable demand level, such as
number of complementary products sold historically or daily or other such determinations.
39.
Upon information and belief, each of Best Buy Co., BestBuy.com, and BBY is
infringing (literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents) the ’036 patent in this District and
throughout the United States by, among other things, making, using, importing, offering for sale
and/or selling products and services, including at least their Related Products offering feature,
which practice one or more of the claims of the ’036 patent. For instance, upon information and
belief, Amazon’s Frequently Bought Together feature offers products together where at least one
of the products is a complementary product that has an acceptable demand level, such as number
of complementary products sold historically or daily or other such determinations.
40.
Upon information and belief, Dell is infringing (literally and/or under the doctrine
of equivalents) the ’036 patent in this District and throughout the United States by, among other
-9-
things, making, using, importing, offering for sale and/or selling products and services, including
at least its Related Products and Required Products offering features, which practice one or more
of the claims of the ’036 patent. For instance, upon information and belief, Dell’s Related
Products and Required Products features offer products together where at least one of the
products is a complementary product that has an acceptable demand level, such as number of
complementary products sold historically or daily or other such determinations.
41.
Upon information and belief, Delta is infringing (literally and/or under the
doctrine of equivalents) the ’036 patent in this District and throughout the United States by,
among other things, making, using, importing, offering for sale and/or selling products and
services, including at least its sales of airline ticket on its website with hotel and Trip Services &
Activities packages, which practice one or more of the claims of the ’036 patent. For instance,
upon information and belief, Delta offers hotel and other trip service and activity packages on its
web site with the purchase of airline tickets where at least one of the products is a
complementary product that has an acceptable demand level, such as number of complementary
products sold historically or daily or other such determinations.
42.
Upon information and belief, Expedia is infringing (literally and/or under the
doctrine of equivalents) the ’036 patent in this District and throughout the United States by,
among other things, making, using, importing, offering for sale and/or selling products and
services, including at least its sales of airline ticket on its website with hotel packages under a
"Save Even More – Add a Hotel" heading, which practice one or more of the claims of the ’036
patent. For instance, upon information and belief, Expedia offers hotel packages on its web site
with the purchase of airline tickets where at least one of the products is a complementary product
that has an acceptable demand level, such as number of complementary products sold historically
or daily or other such determinations.
- 10 -
43.
Upon information and belief, HP is infringing (literally and/or under the doctrine
of equivalents) the ’036 patent in this District and throughout the United States by, among other
things, making, using, importing, offering for sale and/or selling products and services, including
at least its offerings on its web site under the headings “Customers who bought also bought,”
“May we suggest” and “Consider these products,” which practice one or more of the claims of
the ’036 patent.
For instance, upon information and belief, these offerings offer products
together where at least one of the products is a complementary product that has an acceptable
demand level, such as number of complementary products sold historically or daily or other such
determinations.
44.
Upon information and belief, Sony is infringing (literally and/or under the
doctrine of equivalents) the ’036 patent in this District and throughout the United States by,
among other things, making, using, importing, offering for sale and/or selling products and
services, including at least its offerings on its web site under the headings “Add Accessories” and
“Sony Recommends,” which practice one or more of the claims of the ’036 patent. For instance,
upon information and belief, these offerings offer products together where at least one of the
products is a complementary product that has an acceptable demand level, such as number of
complementary products sold historically or daily or other such determinations.
45.
Upon information and belief, Wal-Mart is infringing (literally and/or under the
doctrine of equivalents) the ’036 patent in this District and throughout the United States by,
among other things, making, using, importing, offering for sale and/or selling products and
services, including at least its offering on its web site under the heading “People Who Bought
This Item Also Bought”, which practice one or more of the claims of the ’036 patent. For
instance, upon information and belief, this offering offers products together where at least one of
- 11 -
the products is a complementary product that has an acceptable demand level, such as number of
complementary products sold historically or daily or other such determinations.
46.
Each defendant has committed these acts of infringement without license or
authorization.
47.
As a result of each defendant’s infringement of the ’036 patent, Walker Digital
has suffered monetary damages in an amount not yet determined, and will continue to suffer
damages in the future unless each defendant’s infringing activities are enjoined by this Court.
48.
Walker Digital has suffered and will continue to suffer severe and irreparable
harm unless this Court issues a permanent injunction prohibiting each defendant, its agents,
servants, employees, representatives, and all others acting in active concert therewith from
infringing the ’036 patent.
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
Plaintiff Walker Digital, under Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, requests
a trial by jury of any issues so triable by right.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
For the above reasons, Walker Digital respectfully requests that this Court grant the
following relief in favor of Walker Digital and against each defendant:
(a)
A judgment in favor of Walker Digital that each defendant has directly infringed
one or more claims of each of the Asserted Patents;
(b)
A permanent injunction enjoining each defendant and its officers, directors,
agents, servants, affiliates, employees, divisions, branches, subsidiaries, parents, and all others
acting in active concert or participation with each defendant, from infringing each of the
Asserted Patents;
- 12 -
(c)
A judgment and order requiring each defendant to pay Walker Digital its
damages, costs, expenses, and pre-judgment and post-judgment interest for each defendant’s
infringement of each of the Asserted Patents;
(d)
A judgment and order requiring each defendant to provide an accounting and to
pay supplemental damages to Walker Digital, including, without limitation, pre-judgment
interest;
(e)
A judgment and order finding that this is an exceptional case within the meaning
of 35 U.S.C. § 285 and awarding Walker Digital its reasonable attorneys’ fees; and
(f)
Any and all such other relief as the Court deems just and proper.
April 11, 2011
BAYARD, P.A.
Of Counsel:
/s/ Stephen B. Brauerman (sb4952)
Richard D. Kirk (rk0922)
Stephen B. Brauerman (sb4952)
222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 900
Wilmington, DE 19801
(302) 655-5000
rkirk@bayardlaw.com
sbrarueman@bayardlaw.com
Marc A. Fenster
RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT
12424 Wilshire Boulevard 12th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90025
mfenster@raklaw.com
(310) 826-7474
Attorneys for Plaintiff Walker Digital, LLC
- 13 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?