Walker Digital LLC v. Google Inc.

Filing 1

COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Google Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 0311-960711.) - filed by Walker Digital LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(lid) (Attachment 1 replaced on 10/19/2011) (rwc).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE WALKER DIGITAL, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED GOOGLE INC., Defendant. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Plaintiff Walker Digital, LLC (“Walker Digital”) files this complaint for patent infringement against Defendant Google Inc. (“Google”): THE PARTIES 1. Walker Digital is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business located at 2 High Ridge Park, Stamford, CT 06905. Walker Digital is a worldrenowned research and development laboratory responsible for launching several successful businesses, including Priceline.com. 2. On information and belief, Google is a Delaware corporation with its corporate headquarters and principal place of business at 1600 Amphitheater Parkway, Mountain View, California 94043. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 3. This action arises under the patent laws of the United States, Title 35 of the United States Code, including 35 U.S.C. § 271, et seq. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a). 4. On information and belief, Google is subject to this Court’s jurisdiction because Google is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware. In addition, Google has transacted business in this district, including, more specifically, directly and/or through intermediaries, making, using, importing, offering for sale and/or selling products and services in the State of Delaware (including via the provision of such goods and services over the Internet). Google, upon information and belief, is doing substantial business in this District, and has committed acts of patent infringement in this District. 5. Venue is proper in this District under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b) and (c), and 1400(b). THE ASSERTED PATENT 6. On October 18, 2011, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) duly and legally issued U.S. Patent No. 8,041,711 (the “‘711 patent”), entitled “Method and System for Providing a Link in an Electronic File Being Presented to a User,” to Jay S. Walker, Daniel E. Tedesco, John M. Packes, Stephen C. Tulley, Keith Bemer, Dean P. Alderucci, Marc D. Kessman, and James A. Jorasch, who assigned their rights and interests in the ‘711 patent to Walker Digital. A true and correct copy of the ‘711 patent is attached as Exhibit A. 7. Walker Digital is the owner of the ‘711 patent (the “Asserted Patent”). FACTUAL BACKGROUND 8. Walker Digital is a research and development laboratory that has invested many millions of dollars in its intellectual property. Walker Digital is comprised of a diverse group of inventors who solve business problems by analyzing human behavior and designing innovative solutions incorporating modern information technologies. The novel inventions developed by the Walker Digital team are reflected in a portfolio of more than 200 United States and international patents in a wide range of industries that includes retail, vending, credit cards, security, gaming, educational testing, and entertainment. -2- 9. Jay S. Walker, the chairman of Walker Digital, is a named inventor of more than 450 issued and pending United States and international patents, including the Asserted Patent. Mr. Walker is best known as the founder of Priceline.com, which revolutionized the travel industry through unprecedented technology, with the end result of bringing huge savings in airfare, hotel and car rental rates, and other travel related goods and services to every-day consumers. The systems at the heart of Priceline.com’s success were developed in the research and development laboratory of Walker Digital. 10. Development of the inventions conceived by Mr. Walker and the Walker Digital team of inventors would not have been possible without substantial financial investments made by Walker Digital. Funds invested by Walker Digital have been used for many things, including the construction of laboratory facilities utilized to develop and test new inventions. Many of the inventions developed at the Walker Digital laboratories have led to successful businesses, including Priceline.com. Revolutionary technologies, including the methods and systems for delivering advertisements to targeted consumers, as described and claimed in the Asserted Patent, were a direct result of investments made by Walker Digital. COUNT I (Infringement of the ‘711 Patent) 11. Walker Digital incorporates and realleges the allegations of paragraphs 1-10 as if fully set forth herein. 12. Upon information and belief, Google is infringing (literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents) the ‘711 patent in this District and throughout the United States by, among other things, making, using, importing, offering for sale and/or selling products and services, including at least its Google Advertising Programs, which practice one or more claims of the ‘711 patent. For instance, upon information and belief, the Google Advertising Programs -3- include defining preferences that associate data with resource locators, determining information about users, associating preferences to users, receiving requests for content, determining that the content matches data that has been associated with resource locators, modifying the content to include a link to, for example, an advertisement, and presenting the modified content to the user. 13. Google committed these acts of infringement without license or authorization. 14. As a result of Google’s infringement of the ‘711 patent, Walker Digital has suffered monetary damages in an amount not yet determined, and will continue to suffer damages in the future unless Google’s infringing activities are enjoined by this Court. 15. Walker Digital has suffered and will continue to suffer severe and irreparable harm unless this Court issues a permanent injunction prohibiting Google, its agents, servants, employees, representatives, and all others acting in active concert therewith from infringing the ‘711 patent. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Walker Digital demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable. WALKER DIGITAL’S PRAYER FOR RELIEF Walker Digital prays for the following relief: 1. A judgment that Google has infringed (either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents) one or more claims of the ‘711 patent; 2. A permanent injunction enjoining Google and its officers, directors, agents, servants, affiliates, employees, divisions, branches, subsidiaries, parents, and all others acting in active concert or participation with them, from infringing the ‘711 patent; 3. An award of damages resulting from Google’s acts of infringement in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 284; 4. A judgment and order finding that this is an exceptional case within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 285 and awarding to Walker Digital its reasonable attorneys’ fees against Google; -4- 5. A judgment and order requiring Google to provide an accounting to pay supplemental damages to Walker Digital, including without limitation, pre-judgment and postjudgment interest; and 6. Any and all other relief to which Walker Digital may show itself to be entitled. October 18, 2011 Of Counsel: Marc A. Fenster California Bar No. 181067 RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT 12424 Wilshire Boulevard 12th Floor Los Angeles, California 90025 Telephone: 310/826-7474 Facsimile: 310/826-6991 mfenster@raklaw.com BAYARD, P.A. /s/ Richard D. Kirk Richard D. Kirk (rk0922) Stephen B. Brauerman (sb4952) 222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 900 P.O. Box 25130 Wilmington, DE 19899 rkirk@bayardlaw.com sbrauerman@bayardlaw.com (302) 655-5000 Attorneys for Plaintiff Walker Digital, LLC -5-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?