STEINBUCH v. CUTLER
Memorandum in opposition to re 37 First MOTION to Amend/Correct COMPLAINT and Defendant's Request for Leave to Supplement Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss 29 filed by JESSICA CUTLER. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Errata B# 3 Exhibit C# 4 Text of Proposed Order)(Ates, John)
STEINBUCH v. CUTLER
Doc. 42 Att. 4
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ROBERT STEINBUCH, Plaintiff, v. JESSICA CUTLER, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case No. 1:05-cv-00970 (PLF) Judge Paul L. Friedman
ORDER AND JUDGMENT Upon consideration of  the motion of Defendant Jessica Cutler to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, Plaintiff's response, and all other papers submitted in support or opposing such motion, it is this ____ day of ________ 2006, hereby ORDERED, that Defendant's motion to dismiss on account of Plaintiffs failure to meet the $75,000 amount in controversy requirement under 28 U.S.C. Section 1332, is hereby GRANTED for the reasons stated in  Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Amend complaint; it is FURTHER ORDERED, that the there is a legal certainty that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, and this case is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that  Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend is DENIED as moot; it is FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall be DISMISSED from the docket of this Court.
Page 2 of 2
This is a final appealable order. See FED. R. APP. P. 4(a). SO ORDERED ________________________________________ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN United States District Judge DATE: _____________, 2006 Copies to: Jonathan Rosen, Esquire 1200 Gulf Blvd., #1506 Clearwater, Florida 33767 Counsel for Plaintiff John R. Ates, Esq., DC Bar No. 441084 ALBO & OBLON,, LLP 2200 Clarendon Blvd., Suite 1201 Arlington, VA 22201 Matthew C. Billips, Esq. Georgia Bar No. 057110, pro hac vice motion pending MILLER & BILLIPS, LLC 730 Peachtree Street, Suite 750 Atlanta, GA 30308
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?