STEINBUCH v. CUTLER
MOTION for Leave to File Reply Brief by ROBERT STEINBUCH. (Attachments: # 1 Reply Brief# 2 Affidavit Eidelberg Rosen# 3 Affidavit Steinbuch)(Rosen, Jonathan)
STEINBUCH v. CUTLER
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________ STEINBUCH ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) CASE No. 01:05-CV-00970 (PLF) v. ) CUTLER ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________)
MOTION FOR LEAVE FROM THIS COURT'S STAY TO FILE THE ACCOMPANYING REPLY BRIEF TO DEFENDANT'S FILED OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND
On July 11, 2006, this Court ordered: "the proceedings in this case are STAYED pending further order of this Court, including defendant's response to plaintiff's July 9, 2006 motion for leave to file an amended complaint." July 11, 2006 Order (Document # 38 on this Court's docket) (capitalization in original). On August 10, 2006, notwithstanding this Court's Order, Defendant filed a Brief in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Amend along with additional material. Plaintiff seeks leave from this Court's stay to file the attached reply to Defendant's opposition brief that was filed during the stay. The undersigned counsel called Defendant's counsels on August 16, 2006 to inquire as to whether they consent to this Motion, but was unable to reach them. The undersigned counsel left messages for Defendant's counsels (voicemail and email).
Page 2 of 2
CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court grant Plaintiff's Motion for Leave. Dated: August 16, 2006
/s/ Jonathan Rosen Jonathan Rosen (NY0046) 1645 Lamington Rd. Bedminster, NJ 07921 (908) 759-1116 Attorney for Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?