STEINBUCH v. CUTLER
ENTERED IN ERROR. . . .MOTION to Compel to Deem Rule 36 Requests Admitted, Motion to Compel Discovery, and Alternative Motion to Preclude Evidence and Incorporated Memorandum of Law, MOTION for Discovery by JESSICA CUTLER. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1# 2 Exhibit 2# 3 Exhibit 3# 4 Exhibit 4# 5 Exhibit 5# 6 Exhibit 6# 7 Exhibit 7# 8 Exhibit 8)(Billips, Matthew) Modified on 10/11/2006 (td, ).
STEINBUCH v. CUTLER
Doc. 52 Att. 5
Case 1:05-cv-00970-PLF-JMF Case 4:06-mc-00028-WRW
Document 52-6 Filed 09/21/2006 Page 1 of 1 1 Document 8 Filed 10/10/2006 Page 1 of
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION ROBERT STEINBUCH 4:06-MC-00028-WRW JESSICA CUTLER AMENDED ORDER Plaintiff's Motion to Quash (Doc. No. 1) is GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART; On reflection, it appears that the following language in the subpoena duces tecum is too broad: Each and every email, in electronic form, sent to or from (including cc's and/or bcc's) any email account assigned by you to Robert E. Steinbuch, including but not limited to the email address firstname.lastname@example.org As an example, this could include communications between Plaintiff and his lawyer -- Plaintiff's reply lists other examples. So the request set forth in the above quoted language is denied without prejudice to allow Defendant to draw a narrower request. Otherwise the Motion to Quash is denied; however, UALR is permitted to redact the names of student evaluators if it wishes to do so. IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of September, 2006. DEFENDANT PLAINTIFF
/s/ Wm. R.Wilson,Jr. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?