STEINBUCH v. CUTLER

Filing 53

REPLY to opposition to motion re 49 MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery filed by JESSICA CUTLER. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1# 2 Exhibit 2# 3 Exhibit 3# 4 Exhibit 4# 5 Exhibit 5# 6 Exhibit 6# 7 Exhibit 7# 8 Exhibit 8# 9 Exhibit 9# 10 Exhibit 10)(Billips, Matthew)

STEINBUCH v. CUTLER

Doc. 53 Att. 10

Case 1:05-cv-00970-PLF-JMF

Document 53-11

Filed 10/10/2006

Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS RICHARD SHEPPARD ARNOLD UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE 600 W. CAPITOL, ROOM 423 LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201-3325 [phone] Facsimile [phone]

October 3, 2006 Mr. Jonathan S. Rosen Attorney at Law 1645 Lamington Road Bedminster, NJ 07921 Mrs. Beth M. Deere Williams & Anderson, PLLC 111 Center Street Suite 2200 Little Rock, AR 72201-2413 501-396-8815 Fax: [phone] Mr. Matthew C. Billips Miller & Billips, LLC 730 Peachtree Street Suite 750 Atlanta, GA 30308 Re: Dear Counsel: Attached is a copy of the order I have entered regarding the recent discovery dispute. I emphasize that I have directed that communication should be between and among counsel, not with a party. I made an exception to standard operating procedure when I allowed Plaintiff to argue his position during the recent telephone conference. In the future, I will expect Plaintiff's counsel to speak and write for him. As you will note in reading the attached order, I have, for the most part, accepted the precedent submitted by Mrs. Deere. I did so after carefully comparing it with the precedent submitted by Plaintiff. Cordially, /s/ Wm. R.Wilson,Jr. Original to the Clerk of the Court cc: Ms. Sara James Steinbuch v. Cutler, 4:06-MC-00028

Dockets.Justia.com