STEINBUCH v. CUTLER
REPLY to opposition to motion re 49 MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery filed by JESSICA CUTLER. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1# 2 Exhibit 2# 3 Exhibit 3# 4 Exhibit 4# 5 Exhibit 5# 6 Exhibit 6# 7 Exhibit 7# 8 Exhibit 8# 9 Exhibit 9# 10 Exhibit 10)(Billips, Matthew)
STEINBUCH v. CUTLER
Doc. 53 Att. 10
Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS RICHARD SHEPPARD ARNOLD UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE 600 W. CAPITOL, ROOM 423 LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201-3325 (501) 604-5140 Facsimile (501) 604-5149
October 3, 2006 Mr. Jonathan S. Rosen Attorney at Law 1645 Lamington Road Bedminster, NJ 07921 Mrs. Beth M. Deere Williams & Anderson, PLLC 111 Center Street Suite 2200 Little Rock, AR 72201-2413 501-396-8815 Fax: 501-396-8835 Mr. Matthew C. Billips Miller & Billips, LLC 730 Peachtree Street Suite 750 Atlanta, GA 30308 Re: Dear Counsel: Attached is a copy of the order I have entered regarding the recent discovery dispute. I emphasize that I have directed that communication should be between and among counsel, not with a party. I made an exception to standard operating procedure when I allowed Plaintiff to argue his position during the recent telephone conference. In the future, I will expect Plaintiff's counsel to speak and write for him. As you will note in reading the attached order, I have, for the most part, accepted the precedent submitted by Mrs. Deere. I did so after carefully comparing it with the precedent submitted by Plaintiff. Cordially, /s/ Wm. R.Wilson,Jr. Original to the Clerk of the Court cc: Ms. Sara James Steinbuch v. Cutler, 4:06-MC-00028
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?