STEINBUCH v. CUTLER

Filing 56

MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages for Leave to File Forty Nine Page Motion to Deem Rule 36 Requests Admitted, Motion to Compel Discovery, and Alternative Motion to Preclude Evidence and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by JESSICA CUTLER. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit A-1# 3 Exhibit A-2# 4 Exhibit A-3# 5 Exhibit A-4# 6 Exhibit A-5# 7 Exhibit A-6# 8 Exhibit A-7# 9 Exhibit A-8)(Billips, Matthew)

STEINBUCH v. CUTLER

Doc. 56 Att. 9

Case 1:05-cv-00970-PLF-JMF

Document 56-10

Filed 10/11/2006

Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS RICHARD SHEPPARD ARNOLD UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE 600 W. CAPITOL, ROOM 423 LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201-3325 [phone] Facsimile [phone]

October 3, 2006 Mr. Jonathan S. Rosen Attorney at Law 1645 Lamington Road Bedminster, NJ 07921 Mrs. Beth M. Deere Williams & Anderson, PLLC 111 Center Street Suite 2200 Little Rock, AR 72201-2413 501-396-8815 Fax: [phone] Mr. Matthew C. Billips Miller & Billips, LLC 730 Peachtree Street Suite 750 Atlanta, GA 30308 Re: Dear Counsel: Attached is a copy of the order I have entered regarding the recent discovery dispute. I emphasize that I have directed that communication should be between and among counsel, not with a party. I made an exception to standard operating procedure when I allowed Plaintiff to argue his position during the recent telephone conference. In the future, I will expect Plaintiff's counsel to speak and write for him. As you will note in reading the attached order, I have, for the most part, accepted the precedent submitted by Mrs. Deere. I did so after carefully comparing it with the precedent submitted by Plaintiff. Cordially, /s/ Wm. R.Wilson,Jr. Original to the Clerk of the Court cc: Ms. Sara James Steinbuch v. Cutler, 4:06-MC-00028

Dockets.Justia.com