STEINBUCH v. CUTLER

Filing 63

MEMORANDUM re Status Conference, Set Deadlines by JESSICA CUTLER. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1# 2 Exhibit 2# 3 Exhibit 3# 4 Exhibit 4)(Billips, Matthew)

STEINBUCHntaCUTLER Pri v. ble

Casea1:05-cv-00970-PLF-JMF C se 4:06-mc-00028-WRW

Dc Page 1 ofo1 . 63 Att. 2 Document 63-3 Filed 09/18/2006 Page 1 of 1 1 Document 5 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 1 of

Subject From Date To

Subpoena John DiPippa <[e-mail]> Friday, September 15, 2006 4:09 pm [e-mail]

Rob, I talked to Jeff Bell and Sarah James about the subpoena. Besides the subpoena being overbroad from your perspective, I think the law school has an independent interest to keep teacher evaluations out of court because we don't have any way to verify the reliability - or even the truth - of the written student comments. The law school's evaluation process is supposed to be a frank and confidential way to mentor new faculty. We have never disseminated anonymous student evaluations and I don't want to start now. John M. A. DiPippa Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Distinguished Professor of Law and Public Policy University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law

https://mail.ualr.edu:81/popup.html

D 5/20 s J 9/1ocket0.6 ustia.com