STEINBUCH v. CUTLER
MEMORANDUM re Status Conference, Set Deadlines by JESSICA CUTLER. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1# 2 Exhibit 2# 3 Exhibit 3# 4 Exhibit 4)(Billips, Matthew)
STEINBUCHntaCUTLER Pri v. ble
Casea1:05-cv-00970-PLF-JMF C se 4:06-mc-00028-WRW
Dc Page 1 ofo1 . 63 Att. 2 Document 63-3 Filed 09/18/2006 Page 1 of 1 1 Document 5 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 1 of
Subject From Date To
Subpoena John DiPippa Friday, September 15, 2006 4:09 pm firstname.lastname@example.org
Rob, I talked to Jeff Bell and Sarah James about the subpoena. Besides the subpoena being overbroad from your perspective, I think the law school has an independent interest to keep teacher evaluations out of court because we don't have any way to verify the reliability - or even the truth - of the written student comments. The law school's evaluation process is supposed to be a frank and confidential way to mentor new faculty. We have never disseminated anonymous student evaluations and I don't want to start now. John M. A. DiPippa Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Distinguished Professor of Law and Public Policy University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law
D 5/20 s J 9/1ocket0.6 ustia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?