STEINBUCH v. CUTLER

Filing 68

Memorandum in opposition to re 66 MOTION to Compel Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel or Deem Admitted Defendant Cutler's Responses to Plaintiff's Requests for Admissions, Interrogatories, and Document Requests and Motion to Strike and for Sanctions filed by JESSICA CUTLER. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1# 2 Exhibit 2)(Billips, Matthew)

STEINBUCH v. CUTLER

Doc. 68 Att. 1

Case 1:05-cv-00970-PLF-JMF Case 4:06-cv-00620-WRW

Document 52 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 1 of 1 1 Document 68-2 Filed 12/29/2006 Page 1 of

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION ROBERT STEINBUCH PLAINTIFF 4:06CV00620 WRW JESSICA CUTLER, et al. ORDER Pending is Plaintiff's Motion for an Extension of Time Until November 15, 2006 to File a Response to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Doc. No. 46). Defendants have responded and Plaintiff has replied.1 The motion is GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART. Although Plaintiff's request for an extension of time is granted, his response must be filed by 5 p.m., Tuesday, October 10, 2006, rather than the requested date. Additionally, all discovery is STAYED pending the resolution of the motions to dismiss. IT IS SO ORDERED this 11th day of September, 2006. DEFENDANTS

/s/ Wm. R.Wilson,Jr. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1

See Doc. Nos. 47, 49, and 50.
Dockets.Justia.com