CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON v. NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION

Filing 12

Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply in support of Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment by CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Perkins, Kimberly)

Download PDF
CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON v. NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION Doc. 12 Case 1:07-cv-00048-RBW Document 12 Filed 06/27/2007 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND : ETHICS IN WASHINGTON : : Plaintiff, : : v. : Civil Action No. 07-0048 (RBW) : NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS : ADMINISTRATION, : : Defendant. : ____________________________________: PLAINTIFF'S CONSENT MOTION TO FILE A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS CROSSMOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT THEREOF Plaintiff, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington ("CREW") in the above-captioned case hereby moves, pursuant to Rule 6(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for a short extension of time within which to reply to defendant's Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment up to and including July 6, 2007. No previous date was set for plaintiff's reply brief. Counsel for defendant has stated that he consents to this motion. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Anne L. Weismann (D.C. Bar No. 298190) Kimberly D. Perkins (D.C. Bar No. 481460) Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington 1400 Eye Street, N.W., Suite 450 Washington, D.C. 20005 Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:07-cv-00048-RBW Document 12 Filed 06/27/2007 Page 2 of 2 Phone: 202-408-5565 Fax: 202-588-5020 Attorneys for Plaintiff Dated: June 27, 2007 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?