CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON v. NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION

Filing 7

Memorandum in opposition to re 5 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment filed by CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON. (Attachments: # 1 Supplement Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment# 2 Supplement Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Statement of Material Facts# 3 Statement of Facts Plaintiff's Rule 7(H) Statement of Material Facts# 4 Text of Proposed Order Plaintiff's Proposed Order)(Perkins, Kimberly)

Download PDF
CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON v. NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION 4 Doc. 7 Att. Case 1:07-cv-00048-RBW Document 7-5 Filed 06/06/2007 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND : ETHICS IN WASHINGTON : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS : ADMINISTRATION, : : Defendant. : ____________________________________: Civil Action No. 07-0048 (RBW) [PROPOSED] ORDER Upon consideration of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, Plaintiff's Opposition thereto and Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, and the entire record herein, and for the reasons explained in the Memorandum Opinion issued on this date, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment is granted and Defendant's motion for summary judgment be, and hereby is, DENIED, and it is further ORDERED that within three days defendant shall produce full unredacted versions of document numbers 3, 5, 7, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 18a, 24, 26, 27, 29, 30, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 40, 42, 44, 45, 46, 48, 49, 51, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59 and 60. Dated: ___________ ___________________________ REGGIE B. WALTON United States District Court Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?