FARM-TO-CONSUMER LEGAL DEFENSE FUND et al v. SCHAFER et al

Filing 12

MOTION to Dismiss by ED SCHAFER (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support, # 2 Affidavit Dr. John Clifford, # 3 Affidavit Reed Macarty, # 4 Exhibit A to Macarty Declaration, # 5 Exhibit B to Macarty Declaration, # 6 Exhibit C to Macarty Declaration, # 7 Exhibit D to Macarty Declaration)(Wechsler, Peter)

Download PDF
BEFORE THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund, et al. Plaintiffs v. U.S. Department of Agriculture Ed Schafer, Secretary, et al. Defendants : : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 1:08-cv-01546 Judge Rosemary M. Collyer NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS TO THE PARTIES: Please take notice that counsel for Plaintiffs, David G. Cox, has a new address and other contact information. Please forward all pleadings and papers filed in this matter to the following: David G. Cox 4240 Kendale Road Columbus, Ohio 43220 Telephone: (614) 457-5167 Cell phone: (614) 499-5358 dcoxlaw@columbus.rr.com Email: Respectfully submitted, /s/ David G. Cox David G. Cox 4240 Kendale Road Columbus, Ohio 43220 Telephone: (614) 457-5167 Cell phone: (614) 499-5358 Email: dcoxlaw@columbus.rr.com Counsel for Plaintiffs CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was served by regular U.S. mail on this 4th day of November, 2008 to the following: U.S. Attorney General Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 Counsel for the Department of Agriculture U.S. Attorney's Office 501 3rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20001 Counsel for the Department of Agriculture U.S. Department of Agriculture c/o Ed Schafer, Secretary 1440 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20250 Defendant James E. Riley Danielle Allison-Yokom Michigan Department of Agriculture Donald Koivisto, Director 525 W. Ottawa Street Lansing, MI 48933 /s/ David G. Cox 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?